Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 5)

      
   
     
  
  
  
    
   
     
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
   
    
   
  
  
  
  
  
    
  
  
    
   
    
   
   
  
   
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
    
  
  
   
  
   
   
  
  
  
  
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B5. Istanbul 2004 Intei 
k,=GrevyRIR 
kei. ur (2) 
c — GrevB / 
k, = GreyB/B 
Where, GreyR, GreyG, GreyB are the value of grey in the 
scene. Ravers Gavers Baver are averages of each channel. 
aver 
5.2 MRSCR 
The Multi-scale Retinex (MSR) [Rahman, 1996a] is a 
generalization of the single-scale retinex (SSR) [Jobson, 1996], 
which, in turn, is based upon the last version of Land's 
center/surround retinex. À later version, the MSRCR, combines 
the dynamic range compression and color constancy of the 
MSR with a color ‘restoration’ filter that provides excellent 
color rendition [Rahman, 1998]. The MSRCR has been tested 
on a very large suite of images. The Retinex theory assumes 
that human vision is based on three retinal-cortical systems, 
each processing the low, middle and high frequency of the 
visible spectrum independently [Marini, 2000]. The general 
form of the MSRCR can be summarized by the following 
equation: [Rahman, 1996b] 
S 
R,, (x,y) = F, (x, y) 2, w, (log[7, (x y)]- 
s=l 
log[ 1, (x, y) * M, (x, y)b. is] 2, 0 Ne (3) 
Where R. is the ith band of the MSRCR output, S is the 
number of scales being used, w, is the weight of the scale, I; is 
the ith band of the input image, and N is the number of bands in 
the input image. The surround function M, is defined by 
M (x,y) = K explo? /(? € y^] 
where * eis the standard deviation of the sth surround function, 
and. [[K exp[oz /G? y^ dxdy 71. 
Fi(x,y) are the color restoration function defined by 
Ex op E 
S nox) 
n=l 
However, from the Tab.l, it's clear that the MSRCR can't 
balance the lightness of the image, although it can obtain a 
suitable dynamic range, wonderful color rendition and keep 
geometry information effectively. Then the lightness balancing 
is needed. 
5.3 Lightness balancing 
To avoid decreasing the contrast of the image, the methods 
listed in Tab.1 are abnegated. Here the lightness balancing can 
be accomplished just by gain/offset rectification in little 
windows of the image. It can keep the tone information in detail 
effectively, although the window size is always be given firstly. 
6. RESULT AND CONCLUSION 
Two origin images above are processed by the framework 
proposed in Fig.11. Compared with images processed by 
traditional dodging methods and merely MSRCR, the 
difference is clear. 
  
     
    
However, since the MSRCR can process image in several DJ: 
scales, the lightness balancing should be united into the form of Perf 
MSRCR. What's more, as a method based on retinex theory, on I 
which is describing the human perception on color as an 
important theory of computational color constancy, the new Kan 
version should include such functions. It’s also the next Tecl 
direction of us in the work for image re-rendition. 364| 
Kob 
and 
Edw 
The 
Lan 
Ame 
Li > 
Grot 
Rem 
ACKNOCKLEDGEMENTS D. N 
Colc 
Thanks for the supporting from Natural Science Fund of P. R. 18 
China (No. 40171081) and Surveying and Mapping Fund of 
State Bureau of Surveying and Mapping of P. R. China (No. Mila 
2001-02-03). proc 
Thoi 
REFERENCES Pres 
Blinn Jim, Newell Martin, 1976. Texture and Reflection in T.Pe 
Computer Generated Images. In: Communications of ACM, [mag 
19(10): 542-547. 37.8 
Chehdi, K., 1993. An Optimal Image Enhancement Method By Z.Rz 
Decisional Criteria. In: Proc of ICSP '93, pp. 981-984. Retii 
IEE] 
Chuang Yung-Yu, Zongker D.E. Hindorff Jetal, 2000. et 
Environment Matting Extensions: Towards Higher Accuracy Zug 
and Real-time Capture. In: SJGGRAPH2000, pp.121-130. Mult 
Com 
T. Danaher, X. Wu and N. Campbell, 2001. Bi-directional Scie 
Reflectance Distribution Function — Approaches to Digi 
Radiometric Calibration of Landsat TM imagery. In: : 
IGARSS 2001 conference, pp.2654-2657. Z.R 
of tt 
Fournier A, Gunawan A, Romanzin C, 1993. Common Proc 
Illumination between Real and Computer Generated Scenes. In: 
Proceedings of the Graphics Interface'93, pp.254-262. Sher 
Surv 
F. Gasparini, R. Schettini, 2004. Color Balancing of Digital J.Co 
Photos Using Simple Image Statistics. Pattern Recognition, 37 
(6), pp. 1201-1217. Shur 
Imag 
Guo Xiao-Fang, 2000. Radiometry Correction of Airborne SPIE 
Imaging Spectrometer Data. Journal of Image and Graphics, 
5(1), pp.16-20. Taka 
Renc 
Hu Qing-wu;-Li-Qing-quan, 2004. Image Restoration Based on Com 
Mask Technique. Geomatics and Information Seience-of Wuhan 
University, 29(4), pp. 319-323. E Tian 
base 
James, D.F., Robert, A.S., 1983. Spatially Variant Contrast Petri 
Enhancement Using Range Modification. SP/E, 22(3), pp. 378- 9(4), 
381. 
: Tian 
R. Jaroszhiewicz, 2003. Fast Extraction of BRDFs and Material Corr 
Maps from Images. Master Thesis. Jour, 
922 
  
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.