hul 2004
lagoon
m 100000
\
iometric
and the
the Jupp
cients of
ile set of
sect.
mputes a
ep) into
e precise
produces
, Figures
. Erasmo
and the
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004
UFU
1
urpe pet
Depth (m)
EC on rnin
erred barrio Mere tf dt med mer
190 150.200 250
Distance (pts)
Figure 13. S. Erasmo littoral. Bathymetry estimation using
Jupp’s model (dotted line) vs. real bathymetry (plain line).
€
( i ^
IM X
Sede 24 X
=
e. A X
Q ^ à
| i
i Be envahie tape nceennes
yr = O n
T S he re
Distance (pts)
Figure 14. S. Erasmo littoral. Bathymetry estimation using SGA
algorithm (dotted line) vs. real bathymetry (plain line).
6. CONCLUSIONS
The great attention that is given to the lagoon of Venice and to
his environmental problems is justified by the value of the
ecosystems and for the wealth of the artistic patrimony that it
contains. ^ The erosion phenomenon subtracts sand and
sediments to the lagoon with a dynamics that provokes the
lowering and the levelling of the depth contour, and the
disappearance of the physical typical designs of the lagoon
environment. Nowadays, the discharge of sediments from the
lagoon of Venice is esteemed in about 1.100.000 m per year,
so emerge the problem of developed a fast and cheap
monitoring technique of the bathymetry in the lagoon.
The methodology proposed in this paper is an evolution of the
Jupps DOP model that holds account of the complex
environmental conditions of the lagoon. Tests in the lagoon of
Venice shows a good correlation between the real bathymetry
derived from the sounding points, used as reference data, and
the computed bathymetry with the stratified genetic algorithm
developed.
As like as the original Jupp model, even the new SGA
algorithm needs to be calibrated to correctly esteem the
coefficients of absorption. The limit of a such analysis lies in
the correct computation of these coefficients for a spatial
generalization, that, for the lagoon of Venice, are very variable.
This problem, however, is to be attribute to the very complex
lagoon ecosystem and should be deeper studied.
99
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work has been carried out under a research framework
founded by the Italian Ministry for University and Scientific
Research (MIUR), contract title: “The use of high resolution
satellite images for environmental analyses”.
REFERENCES
Abduallah, K., Mohd Dimyata, K., Cracknell, A.P., Vaughan,
R.A., 1991. Evaluation of Landsat TM and Spot data for
shallow water Bathymetry. 12th Asian Conference on Remote
Sensing, Singapore.
Bierwrth, P.N., Lee, T., Burne, R.V., 1992. Shallow sea floor
reflectance and water depth derived by unmixing multispectral
imagery. Proceedings of the First Thematic Conference,
Remote Sensing for Marine and Coastal Environments, New
Orleans.
Gianinetto, M., Mirtelli, G., Lechi, G.M., 2003. Un modello
genetico per la stima della batimetria da satellite ad alta
risoluzione geometrica. ^ Proceedings of the 7th ASITA
Conference, Verona, Italy, pp.1169-1174.
Gordon, H.R., McCluney, W.R., 1975. Estimation of the depth
of sunlight penetration in the sea for remote sensing. Applied
Optics 14, pp. 413-416.
Hengel, W.V., Spitzer, D., 1991. Multi-temporal water depth
mapping by means of Landsat TM. International Journal of
Remote Sensing, 12, pp. 703-712.
Jupp, D.L.B., 1988. Background and extensions to depth of
penetration (DOP) mapping in shallow coastal waters.
Symposium on Remote Sensing of the Coastal Zone, Goald
Coast, Queensland.
Lyzenga, D.R., 1986. Remote sensing of bottom reflectance
and water attenuation parameters in shallow water using aircraft
and Landsat data. [International Journal of Remote Sensing,
2(1), pp. 71-82.
Nordman, M.E, Wood, Michalek J., 1990. Water Deph
extraction from Landsat 5 imagery. Procedings of twenty third
international symposium on remote sensing of environments,
pp. 1129-1139.
Vermote, E. F., Tanré, D., Deuzé, J. L., Herman, M., Morcrette,
J. J, 1997. Second Simulation of Satellite Signal in the Solar
Spectrum, 6S: An Overview. [EEE Transaction on Geoscience
and Remote Sensing, 35 (3), pp. 675-686.