Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 7)

004. 
sen 
nse 
les, 
ond 
tion 
and 
ated 
with 
nsor 
and 
s nO 
hich 
face 
data 
can 
Xt be 
Is: It 
ds a 
ages 
line 
x be 
and 
n be 
| and 
in be 
ound 
. All 
rect 
ation 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004 
  
  
Math Model [DLT 
  
SERIE NE STE 
Iteration [1 of HH 
H of Ground Pts. [3 
Redundancy [45 — 
ROOT MEAN SQUARE (RMS) 
Image (pixels] 10.591257 
Longitude [0 325017 
A EN 
  
  
  
Y "Latitude 
Z Elevation [a 
  
Ent Cmm 
Figure 3- Orientation results of Right image 
  
  
  
  
  
Math Model [DLT > 
Iteration [7 oF [4 
  
# of Ground Pts. [23 
Redundancy 45 
ROOT MEAN SQUARE (RIS) 
Image (pixels) 10627049 
Longitude [0.312934 r. 
Latitude [0.543477 
HS OPAC UOI Tanto 
| Z/Elevation {0 
  
  
  
Figure 4- Orientation results of Left image 
As a shown on figure Root mean square error of Right image 
is RMS Y=0.329m, RMS X=0.491m ,RMS XY= 0.591m and 
for left image is RMS Y=0.313 m, RMS X=0.543 m, RMS 
XY= 0.627 m. Residuals of ground control points for both 
images is founded minimum 0.02 m and maximum 0.90m. 
In test some GCP’ s used as check point, results are; 
  
  
  
  
  
  
CHECK RIGHT IMAGE LEFT IMAGE 
POINTS MEAN RMS(XY) | MEAN RMS(XY) 
432 0.63 m. 0.63 m. 
174 
433 0.44 m. 0.59 m. 
439 
437 0.61 m. 0.58 m. 
173 
MEAN 0.56 m. 0.60 m. 
  
  
  
  
Figure 4 — Orientation results in case of check points 
1165 
4.1.3Comparison of Results 
After DLT stereo restitution of images and orthophoto 
production with two different DEM has been carried out by 
Digital Photogrammetric Systems in GDLRC. Comparative 
results between coordinate differences of photogrammetric 
restituted and digitized from satellite images feature points 
are shown below. For comparison well identified feature 
points are chosen and blunders were eliminated. 
1) Coordinate differences between feature points from 
orthophoto which is produced by DTM via stereo 
images, from satellite images and photogrammetric 
restitution for 4b area. 
  
  
TABLE 1 
8.000 
.. 6.000 
E 4000 f == 
2.000 |: 
0.000 * 
  
POINT ACCURACY 
  
1:4. 7. 10. 13.46 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 
POINT NUMBER 
  
  
  
MEAN MXY= 2.889 m. 
2 ) Coordinate differences between feature points from 
orthophoto which is produced by DTM via YUKPAF 
(Digitized 1/25000 contour lines) and photogrammetric 
restitution for 4b area . 
  
TABLE 2 
  
POINT ACCURACY (m.) 
  
1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 
POINT NUMBER 
  
  
MEAN MXY:- 3.870 m. 
3 ) Coordinate differences between feature points from 
orthophoto which is produced by DTM via stereo images 
from satellite images and photogrammetric restitution for 9b 
area. 
TABLE 3 
  
8.000 p= 
6.000 [-— mW 
4.000 EIMXY 
2.000 
  
POINT ACCURACY (m.) 
0.000 
1 3 5:7. 9 11 1315 17 1921 23 25 27 29 31 33 
POINTNUNBER 
  
  
MEAN MXY: 4.147 m. 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.