Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 7)

tanbul 2004 
CORRECTION OF ATMOSPHERIC AND BIDIRECTIONAL EFFECTS IN 
n MULTISPECTRAL ADS40 IMAGES FOR MAPPING PURPOSES 
1278 
U. Beisl* *, N. Woodhouse^ 
1283 
* Leica Geosystems GIS & Mapping GmbH, Heinrich-Wild-Strasse, CH-9435 Heerbrugg, Switzerland 
1289 Ulrich.Beisl 9 gis.leica-geosystems.com 
? Leica Geosystems GIS & Mapping LLC, 10840 Thornmint Road, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92127, USA 
1295 Neil. Woodhouse @gis.leica-geosystems.com 
1301 Commission VII, WG VII/1 
506 KEY WORDS: Atmosphere, Mapping, Correction, Algorithms, Automation, Model, Mosaic, Sensor 
1314 
ABSTRACT: 
1321 
The radiometry of photogrammetric images is influenced by various effects from outside the camera. One prominent effect is the 
additional path radiance from atmospherically scattered sun light. This occurs especially at short wavelengths and long atmospherical 
1329 p p y E E p 
path lengths, which gives rise to an increasing blueshift towards the borders of the images. Another effect is the bidirectional 
reflectance from the ground surface (BRDF). This effect depends on the illumination and the viewing geometry as well as on the 
wavelength and is caused by a varying amount of subpixel shadows on the ground. At high solar elevation, frame sensors encounter 
a bright area within the image, the so-called hot spot; line scanners like the ADS40 show an across-track brightness gradient. This 
prevents precise intra- and intercomparison of images, affects spectral ratios and is adverse to proper mosaicking. In order to correct 
the blueshift in the images a dark pixel subtraction algorithm is applied to the data, which accounts for the largest effects of the 
atmosphere. The algorithm takes into account the view angle dependence of the path radiance by calculating column statistics. For 
the bidirectional effect an automated semi-empirical algorithm is presented to correct a set of line scanner images simultaneously to a 
defined viewing and solar geometry. Statistics of the image brightness are calculated and the model fitted to the averages. These 
statistics can be calculated either from all pixels or can be class specific. The method is applied to ADS40 data after system and 
atmospheric correction in order to produce a well-defined input for the orthorectification and mosaicking. As an example, images 
from a flight campaign are processed to orthophotos and mosaicked without further dodging or feathering. 
1. INTRODUCTION hue which appears towards the borders of the images (i.e. for 
large view zenith angles. For a definition of the angles see 
“In most cases, the atmosphere is perceived as a hostile entity Figure 1). 
whose adverse impacts must be neutralized or eliminated before 
remotely sensed data can be properly analyzed.” (Schott, 1997) 
Despite the fact that atmospheric effects reveal physical 
properties of the atmosphere, this is usually not the aim of 
taking images. 
Almost the same is true for bidirectional effects. 
"The non-Lambertian nature of the terrestrial surface is a major 
source of unexplained variability in wide-swath satellite sensor 
data acquired in the solar reflective wavelength, hindering 
quantitative analysis in the spectral, temporal, and locational 
domains." (Chopping, 2000) 
The bidirectional effects contain information about the 
geometric and biophysical structure of the object, which is a 
fascinating field of research, albeit progress is slow in 
developing universal models and model inversion techniques. 
Applications of this research area range from new classification 
  
  
  
methods to crop yield predictions. 
But again, this is usually not the intention of mapping imagery. 
Therefore, fast empirical models which remove those effects are 
sufficient. 
2. ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS 
The most prominent atmospheric effects in aerial images even 
under clear sky conditions are a general brightening and a blue 
  
* Corresponding author. 
Figure 1. Coordinate system for reflection (0; incident solar 
zenith angle, 0, reflected view zenith angle, ¢ view 
azimuth angle). 
For operational purposes (no pressure cabin in plane) flight 
elevations below 4000 m (12.000 ft) are preferred. This reduces 
the amount of atmosphere between sensor and ground compared 
to satellite systems. However, in order to cover a reasonable 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.