International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004
Spots
Endes GPSX(m) [GPSY(m) |imageX(m|imageY(m) | AN| A Y |error(m)
4318781| 39535767| 4318786| 39535768] -5| -1| 5.10
4318564] 39535887] 4318562] 39535888 2] -1| 2.24
4318644| 39535100| 4318647| 39535100} -3 0] 3.00
121 | 4318838] 39535275] 4318823] 39535290f 15! -15| 21.21
4318947| 39535223| 4318952| 39535230] -5| -7| 8.60
4318798| 39535791| 4318802| 39535793] -4] -2| 4.47
RMS(n) 7.44
4318655| 39535529| 4318661] 39535526| -6 3| 671
4318767, 39535731| 4318773| 39535740] -6| -9]| 10.82
125 | 4318578] 39535806) 4318580] 39535818] -2] -12| 12.17
4318474] 39535597] 4318479] 39535589f -5 8|] 9.43
RMS(m) 9.78
4318725] 39538905) 4318728] 39538897] -3 8.54
4318872] 39538879] 4318882] 39538879] -10 0] 10.00
4318941] 39539165] 4318951] 39539163] -10 10.20
115 | 4318909] 39539170) 4318900] 39539172 9| -21] 9.22
4318874| 39539091| 4318885| 39539091| -11 0| 11.00
4318736| 39539095| 4318746] 39539093] -10 2| 10.20
RMS(m) 9.86
Table 5 Border Points” Coordinate Precision
3.4.3 Area Precision: Arca precision is one of the important
values for land use spots. Spots were selected to statistic their
accuracy which categories and figures in images is similar to
the reality. Arca between data measured from images and from
ficld surveyed was compared. The result is listed below:
| Spots ^. | Surveyed Measured Difference Error
ID by GPS | by RS (m?) (m?) percent
(m?) (100%)
121 96356.39 9397137 2385.02 2.84
ER 35053.58 36681.83 -1628.25 4.65
123 37626.18 67703.39 -10077.2 17.49
125 46698.9 51769.26 -5070.36 10.86
139 23869.25 22347.79 1521.46 5.54
151 70330.15 83637.52 -13327.4 18.95
156 49675 68 32395.95 -2720.27 5.48
160 9307.02 8153.7 1133.28 12.39
159 21540.98 18800.94 2740.04 12.72
195 67539.25 36368 49 53185 78.72
Table 6. Arca Precision
From the above table. the largest difference spots are No.195.
Because the arca has been still changed after the images
obtained.
4. SOFTWARE
A^ series of software facing to land use investigation (especially
suitable to our countrv) has been developed. Most of land use
investigation function is designed in this software according to
considering our country’s investigation characteristic. It js
models which include image
divided in several
otho-rectification. multi-resource images matching and merging,
change information extracting and statistic automatically,
surveying with GPS, map updating. and ete. With this series of
software. data formats and standard can be unified. Computer
solves many problems more rapidly and correctly which has
been embarrassed land use investigation workers for many
years.
S. CONCLUSION
Four kinds of Chinese counties have been classified according
to their land use characteristic. economical development, area.
the speed of land use change. and ete. Which Kinds of remote
sensing images are the most suitable for some county land use
investigation can be looked up from tablel.
There are five schemes about. change spots extraction and
surveying with GPS recommended for different county
according to which kind of images and materials they are in
possession of.
From the experiment in Jinnan county of ‘Tianjin. we can
conclude that using high resolution images (for example.
SPOTS 2.5m) this year and the other reference materials(land
use maps or land use database) last vear can extract the change
information for 1:10000 map scale geometric need. Navigation
GPS can guide people to the object place and ascertain land use
category.
In a word. modern technology of 738" is feasible and efficient
for land use investigation. especially at this time that the high
resolution remote sensing images can be obtained and
processed easily. It will accelerate the speed about improving
modern management of land use. Computers and GPS will
substitute for human's hands. feet and eyes. Although change
information can not be detected and extracted completely
automatically. but with the aids of modern technology and
software. the speed of interpretation will be accelerated. too.
6. REFERENCES
Yingcheng Li. Yanli Xue. Xiaolong Liu. 2003. the Feasibility
Report for Modern Technology Research for Chinese Land Use
Investigation
Xiaolong Liu. Yanli Xue. Tongying Guo. 2004. Study Report
for Modern Technology Research for Chinese Land Use
Investigation.
312
TX
? De]
KEY WO
ABSTRA(
Unprecede
biogeochet
rapid grow
limitations
of Hatay is
manageme
plain of the
river by a
constraints
satellite im
information
the irrevers
for the reg
respectivel
detriment «
and develc
constraints
Human-ind
changes, [
productive
ecosystem
global scale
Evrendilek,
common
biodiversity
LULC are
into cropla
lands, def
cultivation,
Evrendilek
changes ov
forests and
2003). For
concentratic
association
fuels (275
2003). The
changes to t
in the 199
e Ee
*
Correspon