Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 7)

il 2004 International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004 
  
  
  
     
t approximately the 120 hectare forest in 1955. According to the 
digital photogrammetric survey using the aerial photograph A 
taken in 1973 the forest area is determined to be 130 hectare. i Eq 
NC ee IPM AS P 
Thus, it is seen that the forest area is increased approximately 
10hectare. It is thought that one of the most important reasons 
of this increase reason of the forest area is the migration from 
rural area to urban area especially in 1960's. 
  
Aden | 
-07. 8260 013 Mk tá Cuiid < 
soir can 00) Kl 
  
  
w|81D1. : 
T Jal 2608 
Hes 0717. Y. 0565, Z ONU 
ELE RR TRY 
  
  
  
Figure 9. The forest boundaries in 1955 
  
  
  
According to aerial photograph taken in 1973, it is found that 
the state had not brought a suit against the private owners 
parcels covered 17hectare forest cover. In respect to cadastre 
works in 1982 there is 14.1 hectare forest area that the state did 
not bring a suit against their ownerships. 
  
  
  
  
FN) 
I 
FL 
  
  
  
  
Figure 8. The old school corners for absolute orientation 
The forest presence in the study area between 1970 and 1982 is 
decreasing. It is determined that this forest cover is almost 3 
hectare. It can be state that one of the basic reasons of this is 
cadastre works in this region. Because, the state had brought a 
suit against the owners in the 188 parcels after the cadastre 
works had completed. Because of this situation some residents 
in this region had cut down the forest cover in their parcels. 
But, the significant increase of the forest cover between 1982 
  
  
  
  
Figure 10. The forest boundaries in 1982 
  
It is seen that the results of suits about forest property are not 
en and 2002 years is seen. It can be two important reasons for this the Same as the de facto of the parcels ownership for the change 
iDARY increase on the forest area. One of these reasons is migration. of the forest presence with time. Te the Sone. forest 
The other reason is the property and forest cadastre works property demarcations have not been determined properly 
completed in the region. If the cadastre works had completed in according to decision of the law court. So the residents live in 
ympared this region, the forest cover could not be seen as a threat for the qs fes m wood us the law e Sot ons Rd 
rmation property ownership right. Because of this, the residents donot 27044 270U Sermimng ic ores profes y demarcations. This 
; destroy the forest cover naturally formed in their parcels. situation has affected the cadastral works to be negative in the 
1ed data ve 
The attribute change of the parcels about forest cover is given ; dam debis uk ! 
on figure 6 in the study area. According to this figure the state In spite of the all of the impossible conditions it is determined 
has brought a suit against the parcels owner, which cover the 25 that there is important increase in the forest cover after cadastral 
siven in hectare forest area, after the cadastre works did in 1982. In works in the region. 
covered spite of the forest cover the parcels, totally 13.4 hectare, 
registered as a private property in Title deeds. 
445 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.