International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004
E Ed
PA d s
E CE
D
Ej
d
Figure 7: Fuzzy c-means clu re
highlighted in yellow)
3.3 Competitive learning networks
The clustering results found by the competitive leaning
networks algorithm are shown in Figures (9) and (10).
On a first view all three clustering algorithms provide
reasonable classes which point back to vegetation, buildings
and background. A comparison will be carried out in the next
section. At this point we want to emphasis that with the two
input channels NDDI band and TopHat filtered last pulse range
image sufficient unique feature information is provided to
clustering to separate the vegetation with 3D extend and
building regions from background.
4. ANALYSIS OF CLUSTERING RESULTS
The confusion matrix is often used to discuss the results of
image classification. Given some ground truth the relation
between the "true" classes and the classification result can be
quantified. With the clusters the same principle can be applied.
Mostly a much bigger number of clusters is then related to the
42
- i
DEZ
Figure 9: Competitive learnin
highlighted in yellow)
given ground truth classes to examine the quality of the
clustering algorithm. If no ground truth is available the analysis
may focus on comparing clustering results against each other.
This kind of relative quality analysis is carried out in the
following.
Input to the clustering processes has been the NDDI ratio
between first and last pulse range images (NDDI band) and the
TopHat filtered last pulse range image (TopHat band). The
three processes K-means clustering, fuzzy C-means clustering
and competitive learning networks are employed as discussed in
the section before.
The following confusion matrix (Table 1) contains the number
of pixels assigned to each cluster in the results of K-means
clustering and competitive learning networks. Reading down a
column shows how pixels in one class of K-means were
assigned in the clustering results of competitive learning
networks.
Internatioi
Figur
SYIOMJOU
Sururro] sannadwo)
Table
Notice tl
course i
algorithr
Backgro
rejection
In perce
clusters
Table
That B-
covered
| Class
B-clas
T-clas