Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 7)

  
POST-EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT USING SATELLITE AND 
AIRBORNE DATA IN THE CASE OF THE 1999 KOCAELI EARTHQUAKE, TURKEY 
D. Ozisik?, N. Kerle" 
? General Directorate of Bank of Provinces, Ataturk Bulvari, No:21 Opera/Ankara/TURKEY (dozisik(gilbank.gov.tr) 
? Dept. of Earth Observation Sciences, International Institute of Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, 
Hengelosestraat 99. P.O.Box 6. 7500 AA Enschede/The Netherlands (kerle@itc.nl) 
Commission VII, TS-PS: WG VII/5 
KEY WORDS: Earthquakes, satellite, aerial video, change detection, integration, texture, user 
ABSTRACT: 
To date, prevention of n 
property. Especially following earthquakes, ther 
event hours. Remote sensing technology can pr 
temporal resolution and synoptic coverage. This work aims at integrating 
age assessment in the case of the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake, Turkey. Pre and 
ange detection methodology to detect damaged areas at the regional level. 
limitations in detecting structural damage, airborne oblique video imagery was used to improve 
gery of Golcuk was analyzed by visual interpretation and multi level 
satellite and oblique airborne imagery to improve dam 
post-earthquake Spot4 HRVIR were analyzed using ch 
Since vertical satellite imagery has 
the damage information at the local level. Aerial video ima 
thresholding of texture and color indices feature layers. Additionally, 
ation requirements were investigated by interviewing emergency organizations in 
s of moderate-resolution optical satellite imagery for post-earthquake damage 
technology in emergency activities, user inform 
Turkey. The results indicate significant limitation 
assessment. Despite substantial processing, registration and integration challenges of 
assessment at the local level. On the other hand, even using video imagery c 
the information requires integration of GIS and RS data. 
1. INTRODUCTION 
1.1 Motivation 
Natural disasters are described as rapid and extreme events 
within the geophysical system that result in mortality and 
property damage, which exceeds the response and recovery 
capabilities of the affected area (Kerle and Oppenheimer, 
2002). Prevention of disasters is only rarely achieved with 
today's technology and knowledge. However, it is possible to 
avoid or to diminish the impact of disasters with effective 
disaster management strategies. The main objective of disaster 
management is to increase preparedness, provide early warning, 
monitor the disaster in real time, assess the damage and 
organize relief activities (Ayanz ef al., 1997). For effective 
disaster management there is a need for a variety of geo-spatial 
information at different scales. Geo-information science, 
including geographic information systems (GIS), remote 
sensing (RS), and the Global Positioning System (GPS), can 
provide concrete support for disaster management activities in 
terms of efficiency, and speed up the data management, 
manipulation, analysis, output and lead to more informed 
decisions (Montoya, 2002). Within the disaster management 
cycle, arguably the most challenging phase is the response 
stage, since the situation after the event is usually not clear, 
little is known about what exactly happened, where it happened 
and how many people were affected (Steinle et al., 2001). 
Following a disaster, potential high-speed acquisition and 
dissemination of air and space-borne data with synoptic 
coverage allow the event to be detected and monitored. The use 
of remote sensing technology provides a quantitative base for 
atural disasters is only rarely achieved, and such events continue to pose an increasing threat to life and 
e is a need for rapid, accurate and reliable damage information in the critical post- 
ovide valuable information for response activities due to potentially high spatial- 
(not in a sense of image fusion, but of synergy) vertical 
to determine the effectiveness of the use of remote sensing 
aerial video imagery, it can improve damage 
annot fulfil all user information requirements, as most of 
information about damage and aftermath monitoring to assist 
response operations (Van Westen, 2002). Earthquakes are a 
type of disaster with a high mortality rate and widespread 
destruction. Unpredictability and rapid affects are the major 
characteristics of earthquakes. Urban areas are most vulnerable 
with their concentration of buildings, infrastructure and 
population. In the time of emergency, due to interruptions of 
communication systems and confusing information coming 
from different sources, getting timely, accurate and detailed 
information about the disaster situation is usually a challenging 
task. For quick mobilization of response and relief 
communities, data need to be captured and analysis result made 
available rapidly in the first 72 hours after the earthquake, as 
people, injured or exposed by the disaster, will not normally 
survive more than 72 hours. Remotely sensed data for post- 
earthquake damage assessment can provide valuable 
information for emergency activities. 
1.2 Research Objectives 
Substantial research on post-earthquake damage assessment 
using remotely sensed data has already been carried out (Turker 
and San, 2003; Yusuf ef al., 2003; EDM, 2000). Although a 
multi-temporal approach using change detection is the most 
commonly used methodology, it has substantial limitations, 
such as a short time gap between pre and post-event imagery, 
changes in brightness values due to external factors. Visual 
interpretation and texture analysis (Chiroiu and Andre, 2001) 
using only post-disaster imagery provide more flexible 
solutions compared with the previous one. Remotely sensed 
686 
Inter 
  
data 
sens: 
and 
char: 
main 
satel 
high 
the r 
of ur 
the c 
Ever 
panc 
imag 
due 
suffe 
scan 
infor 
DSM 
proce 
the t 
spati: 
acqu 
obsta 
Aeri 
lowe 
imag 
asses 
majo 
aerial 
1995 
earth 
alone 
by ir 
Septe 
senso 
used 
infori 
calcu 
infori 
This 
borne 
The 
infort 
imag 
local 
sensil 
wides 
aware 
techn 
frequ 
amon 
situat 
usefu 
the us 
to de 
levels 
resear 
1.3 ( 
Kocat 
withir 
world 
Indus
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.