Full text: Proceedings, XXth congress (Part 7)

  
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004 
observed and predicted changes in height on the platform 
0.2 
0.1 
= Ka 
E o ; 
= { 
® H i 
0.1 { 
| 
02 
0 50 100 150 200 250 
epoch number 
02 
E 01 
5 + i 
5 it m 
s 9 i i 
3 
3 01 
a 
02 
0 50 100 150 200 250 
epoch number 
Figure 8. Actual (black) and predicted (grey) height changes 
(top) and corresponding prediction errors in July 9 2001, 
between 10:15-11:15 
Note that the epoch numbers given in both days at 10:15 — 
11:15 interval are less than those at 7:20 — 8:20 intervals. These 
data gaps are due to the inconvenient satellite constellation 
resulting with unsuccessful integer ambiguity solution for the 
relevant epochs of kinematic GPS observations. 
The quality measures of the predictions for the relevant time 
spans in July 9, 2001 are given in Table 2. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
July 9, 2001 
7:20 — 8:20 10:15 — 11:15 
u (m) 0.000 0.000 
r 0.844668 0.845583 
Mean abs. error (m) 0.012 0.018 
Standard deviation (m) 0.020 0.025 
Max. error (m) 0.079 0.082 
Min. error (m) -0.105 -0.080 
Table 1. Quality measures of the prediction results for July 2, 
2001. 
The resulting standard deviations are obtained as the same 
values with the mean square errors of the point heights derived 
from the adjustment of GPS observations. Recalling the figures 
5. 6, 7 and 8, there are some parts of time sequences very 
precisely estimated whereas a very small part are slightly less 
precisely predicted. This is due to the sampling rate of the input 
values which were assumed to be either linearly varying or 
constant values during each hourly period. However, in general 
very good approximations were achieved. 
In addition to the criterion given in Table 1 and Table 2, the 
remaining residual sequences are investigated by using fast 
fourier transform in order to examine the frequency content of 
the residuals. Fig. 9 shows the frequency content of the 
remaining residual series of the approximations. 
July 2 2001, 7:20-8:20 July 2 2001, 10:15-11:15 
2.5 5 
| 
2; | 4 
1.5 i 3 {1a 
    
  
05: 1 
ES i LH i Ti 
0. 0-— dE. US 3 à n 
0 0 50 100 150 
frequency [Hz] frequency [Hz] 
July 9 2001, 7:20-8:20 July 9 2001, 10:15-11:15 
4. . « 4 : 
i 
3 3: i 
H 
2 |; 2 | i 
i | 
i | | 
id i la 
uy ly | ir 
1 M DS 1 i | | 
Bi ult iy Ap ! i 
mo A W “il 
0 LAN 0I gi. ^ 
0 50 100 0 50 100 150 
frequency [Hz] frequency [Hz] 
Figure 9. The frequency content of each neural approximation 
residuals. Note the chaotic form of the residual frequencies for 
all four models. 
The frequency content in the remaining residual reflects a wide 
spectrum of frequencies exist which approve that the resulting 
prediction errors are highly normally distributed random errors 
with zero mean and variances equal to the mean variances of 
adjusted heights from GPS observations (See Table 1, Table 2). 
6. CONCLUSIONS 
The use of artificial neural networks for modelling deformation 
process of engineering structures as well as natural hazards such 
as landslides offers geodesists a good alternative for the 
description of resulting deformations as a function of causing 
effects which are generally more or less non-geodetic 
observations. In case of neural modelling, the determined 
parameters, i.e. the weights between consecutive neurons 
implicitly describe the mapping between the inputs and outputs, 
but cannot be used in any other way as representing a typical 
mathematical function for deformation process. 
One has to note that the results from the neural network are 
particularly depend on the selection of inputs and outputs, and 
the architecture of the network to be used as they are capable of 
learning anything. One disadvantage of neural network 
applications is that there is no single similar solution to any 
given input-output data set as the estimated parameters of the 
network depends on various settings, which are especially 
considered during learning process. In most cases, these settings 
are selected by personal human judgement. Therefore, the 
solution of neural network is referred as sub-optimal solution. 
This means that the obtained solution is just the one among 
other solutions which provide the similar precision of 
approximation and/or prediction. 
In this study, Matlab Version 6.5 Neural Toolbox is used for 
computations. During the network architecture and learning 
process, the number of layers and the neurons in each layer as 
well as the number of training run has been cared to be kept as 
minimum as possible in order to avoid overfitting and 
overtraining. 
The results given in Table 1 and Table 2 show that a very good 
approximation can be succeeded even if the input data sampling 
rate is very low, i.e. every one hour, a measurement of input 
data has been used to generate the input matrix of training and 
testing data sets. The more frequently the input data is 
measured the better approximation can be obtained by using 
neural network methods. On the other hand, the more accurate 
706 
  
on 
Eise 
Heu 
Defi 
(Hai 
fach 
208, 
Miit 
mod 
mon 
Miir 
appr 
Kutt 
Stati 
Zuri 
Pfeu 
exan 
Com 
G.W 
W. V 
Mod 
Wels 
ficati 
Symp 
27-3( 
Wels 
Class
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.