MODELLING POINT CLOUDS FOR PRECISE STRUCTURAL DEFORMATION
MEASUREMENT
S. J. Gordon , D. D. Lichti, M. P. Stewart and J. Franke
Western Australian Centre for Geodesy, Curtin University of Technology
GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia
S.Gordon G curtin.edu.au
KEY WORDS: Laser scanning, Metrology, Modelling, Monitoring, Point Cloud, TLS
ABSTRACT:
Terrestrial laser scanners can rapidly acquire thousands of 3D points over a structure. The individual scan points are of relatively low
precision (£2mm — +50mm) depending on the instrument type. However, combining the dense 3D point data with judicious
modelling strategies can produce
a very precise surface model. A surface model has advantages for structural deformation
monitoring where deflections are small («50mm) and the shape change can potentially vary across the entire structure. The notion of
the research presented in this paper is to exp
measuring structural deformation. Two experiments ha
loit the dense 3D point data (clouds) to assess the sensitivity of laser scanners for
ve been undertaken where, in each experiment, a beam was subjected to
controlled loading. The first experiment involved a timber beam (5.0m x 0.2m x 0.1 m) mounted on an indoor load-testing frame. The
beam was subject to a maximum of 40mm of vertical deflection. T
he focus of the second experiment was a concrete beam (7.0m x
0.5m x 0.5m) placed on an outdoor load-testing frame where it was loaded until failure. All loading was induced by a hydraulic jack
and occurre
d in increments permitting measurements to be made by laser scanners. A Riegl LMS-Z210 laser scanner was used for
both experiments and a Cyra Cyrax 2500 was available for the first. The scanner measurements were validated using close-range
photogrammetry (accuracy of 1:40,000 of object size or better).
1. INTRODUCTION
The difficulty of monitoring deflections is finding a spatial
measurement technique that encompasses numerous desirable
properties, such as reliability, accuracy, low-cost and ease of
installation (Stanton et al., 2003). There are many methods that
purport some of these advantages but not all. For example,
digital photogrammetry can be relatively inexpensive and highly
precise; as well as offering rapid, remote, three-dimensional
data capture and images which provide a permanent visual
record of the test. However, the necessary use of targets may be
disadvantageous in some circumstances, especially when the
object is hazardous to operators or inaccessible. Furthermore,
unless convergent imaging is practiced, the depth dimension
can be poorly observed. This can occur when the laboratory
lacks sufficient space to satisfy an even geometric distribution
of exposure stations. The photogrammetric process also lacks
scale definition, requiring measurements to be acquired using
additional instrumentation, such as a precise scale bar.
Traditionally, contact sensors, such as dial gauges and linear-
variable-differential transducers (LVDTs), are employed for
structural deflection experiments because of their high precision
spatial measurement capabilities. However, their contact nature
precludes them from use during the final stages of destructive
load testing and they are only capable of acquiring
measurements in one dimension. Importantly, the number of
monitoring sites, or data density, is limited by the number of
contact sensors available for the experiment. This is also true
for target availability in photogrammetric metrology, although it
is less of a problem since photogrammetric targets are
inexpensive and may be quickly placed on the object of interest
and its stable surrounds.
e rr ——
" Corresponding author.
Terrestrial laser scanners (TLSs) are modern geomatic data
capture instruments that offer numerous measurement benefits
including three-dimensional data capture, remote and non-
contact (i.e. targetless) operation, a permanent visual record and
dense data acquisition. TLSs are currently being used in a
variety of projects, including heritage mapping, as-built
documentation and topographic surveys. However, the precision
of TLSs is not perceived adequate for industrial metrology
applications, such as deformation monitoring.
The advantage of TLSs is that, although individual sample
points are low in precision (e.g. £2mm to 50mm), modelling
of the entire point cloud may be effective for explaining the
change of shape of a structure. A modelled surface will be a
more precise representation of the object than the unmodelled
observations. In light of this notion, a methodology for
measuring structural deformation, relying on theoretical aspects
of beam mechanics and implemented by constrained least-
squares curve fitting, has been developed and is presented in
Section 2. A statistical test for assessing the redundancy of
estimated parameters is given in Section 3. The results of two
structural deformation monitoring experiments, involving
beams (one concrete and one timber) being loaded in a load-
testing frame, used to test the analytical modelling strategy are
presented in Sections 4 and 5. Both experiments Were
controlled with convergent digital photogrammetry. A
discussion focussing on instrument set up is given in Section 6
and the conclusions are presented in Section 7.
954
In
Su
SU
ar
de
Imi
m
in
hi;
thi
ar
pr
po
are
wi
Jol
dif
as
the
dis
to |
Thi
twi
Thi
con
inte
The
Cor
of i
beai
Supp
The
side
poin
gene
Eq. :
Figu
mod
evide
term
Curve