International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XXXV, Part B7. Istanbul 2004
two angles (a and B) of a triangle relative to its base (baseline
D) determines the dimensions of this triangle. The complete
range equations are derived in (Blais, 2004).
For an incremental change of distance, AZ, one measures the
incremental angle shift AB. This laser spot sensor is in fact an
angle sensor. The angular shift AB caused by the displacement
of the surface is observed through a shift in laser spot position
Ap=(p; — pz). For practical matters, the errors with a
triangulation-based laser scanner come mainly from the
estimate of p, through Sy: An error propagation computation
gives the approximation of the uncertainty in Z,
t2
N
(1)
ó,2——Ó0,
z fD I
where f= effective position of laser spot sensor
D = baseline
5, = uncertainty in laser spot position
Z = distance to object.
From the equation above, one finds that the measurement
uncertainty in Z is inversely proportional to both the camera
baseline and the effective position of the angle sensor wrt the
lens, but directly proportional to the square of the distance.
Unfortunately, f and D cannot be made as large as desired. The
baseline D is limited mainly by the mechanical structure of the
optical set-up (stability of the whole system decreases as D
increases) and by shadow effects (self occlusion problems
increase with D). Rioux, 1984 presents an approach to
triangulation-based range imaging that allows very large fields
of view without compromising the performance of the system.
The value of Ó, depends on the type of laser spot sensor used,
the peak detector algorithm, the signal-to noise ratio (SNR) and
the imaged laser beam shape. Each sensing method will
perform differently (Blais ct al., 1986; Naidu et al., 1991). In
the case of discrete response laser spot sensors (Beraldin et al.,
2003), assuming sub-pixel laser spot position estimation and
high SNR, the limiting factor will be speckle noise (Baribeau et
al., 1991; Dorsch et al., 1994; Jáhne et al., 1999; Amann et al.,
2001). The effect of speckle noise on spot position uncertainty
is approximately given by
= 1 ; 7
$ dm (2)
where fn = receiving lens f-number
À = laser wavelength.
For instance, A=0.68 um and fn=4, the laser sub-pixel
uncertainty is about 1.4 pm. This estimate is for high SNR and
for well-designed 3D systems. The SNR deteriorates rapidly
with distance. The fact that the amount of light collected
decreases with the distance squared and that the majority of
triangulation-based systems don’t use optical sensors with a
built-in current gain mechanism (like those used in time-of-
flight systems) contribute to a deterioration of the SNR.
Overall, the maximum range of triangulation-based laser
scanners, even with a baseline of 1 m, does not exceed 10 m. A
more detailed model of the spatial measurement uncertainty can
be derived by computing the actual joint density function of the
spatial error (probability distributions). The law of propagation
of errors is only an approximation. The complete analysis can
show that the spatial error distribution is skewed and oriented
with the line of sight, ie. anisotropic and in-homogeous
(Johnson et al., 1997). This is represented schematically on
Figure 2.
f. .Emor
|
Z
g^
|
i
—
X
Figure 2. Schematic diagram showing a representation of the
shape of the spatial error distribution for a laser scanner.
2.4.2 Time delay systems
A fundamental property of a light wave is its velocity of
propagation. In a given medium, light waves travel with a finite
and constant velocity. Thus, the measurement of time delays
created by light traveling in a medium from a source to a
reflective target surface and back to the source (round trip)
offers a very convenient way to evaluate distance. The current
accepted value for the speed of light in a vacuum is exactly ¢ =
299,792,458 m/sec. If the light waves travel in air then a
correction factor equal to the refraction index (depending on the
air density) must be applied to ¢, n = 1.00025 (n-water = 1.33).
Let us assume that the speed of light is 3% 10% m/sec. Different
strategies have been devised to exploit this measurement
principle: Time-Of-Flight (TOF) with pulsed lasers, Amplitude
Modulation (AM), Frequency modulation (FM) systems with or
without coherent detection (Koskinen et al., 1991; Baltsavias,
E.P. 1999b.; Wehr et al., 1999; Amann et al., 2001).
Long-range sensors (range exceeding 10 m) are usually based
on the time-of-flight (TOF) technology (also known as laser
radar or lidar for short). The camera to object distance Z is
measured by sending a relatively short impulse of light on a
reflective surface and measuring the round trip, 7, Z=c*1/2. The
range uncertainty for a single pulse is approximately given by
the following equation:
so ST (3)
where 7, - pulse rise time
J, = uncertainty in range estimation pulse system.
A round trip of T=1 microsecond corresponds to a distance of
about 150 m. Assuming a SNR=100 and T,=1 nanosecond, the
range uncertainty is close to 1.5 cm. Such a pulse rise time is
equivalent to a system bandwidth of about 350 MHz (0.35/1
nanoseconds). Most commercial systems based on TOF provide
a range uncertainty in the range 1 cm to 10 cm. Averaging N
measurements will reduce ó., by a factor proportional to square
root of N. Expansion of the SNR can show that the range
uncertainty depends on distance and the detection mechanism
(avalanche photodiode, etc.). Incidentally, Eq. (3) is similar the
result obtain from the estimation of arrival time for the radar
974
Inter
rangi
range
wher
To lc
and/o
bandy
corre:
discri
radar
algori
uncer
by ve
2001)
relate
can be
Other
aroun
power
modul
is coll
phase
time d
where
Again,
wavele
4). Be
specifi
the ab:
This is
of seve
around
use mt
two-tor
frequer
is abou
IS m (
last. tw
Baltsav
The la:
frequen
Here, t
either
modula
triangul
as a c
determi:
detector
optical |
smaller
2001; S
distance