International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B3, 2012
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia
manual measurement of control points in the images and their use
in the bundle adjustment could provide us with better and more
robust results in terms of geometric precision even though this
would add a time consuming amount of manual work.
The advances that computer vision has brought to the photogram-
metric work flow have allowed the use of IBM even in complex
low textured scenes. The results of the automatic IBM method
may be inferior to the ones of the TLS in terms of geometric ac-
curacy but IBM, thanks to its scalability, low cost and on the field
rapidity, remains an interesting solution to TLS. This confirms
the fact that between IBM and TLS there is no single method for
modelling one scene and that parameters such as the nature of
the scene, the materials of the scene and the expected geometric
accuracy should always be considered when choosing an acquisi-
tion method especially nowadays that IBM open source software
are available.
REFERENCES
Alshawabkeh, Y. and Haala, N., 2004. Integration of digital
photogrammetry and laser scanning for heritage documentation.
In: XXth International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote
Sensing Congress, Comission V, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 424—429.
APERO/MICMAC, 2012. http://www.micmac.ign.fr/.
Baltsavias, E., 1999. A comparison between photogrammetry
and laser scanning. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Re-
mote Sensing 54, pp. 83-94.
Beraldin, J.-A., 2004. Intergration of laser scanning and close
range photogrammetry - the last decade and beyond. In: XXth
International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Congress, Comission VII, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 972-983.
Boehler, W. and Marbs, A., 2004. 3d scanning and photogram-
metry for heritage recording: a comparison. In: Proceedings of
the 12th International Conference on Geoinformatics, University
of Gavle, Sweden, pp. 291-298.
CloudCompare, 2012. http: //www.danielgm.net/cc/.
El-Hakim, S., Beraldin, J.-A., Picard, M. and Cournoyer, L.,
2008. Surface reconstruction of large complex structures from
mixed range data the erechtheion experience,. In: The XXI
Congress of the International Society for Photogrammetry and
Remote Sensing, ISPRS, Beijing, China.
Forstner, W., 2009. Computer vision and remote sensing-lessons
learned. In: Act of 52th photogrammetric week Computer Vision
and Remote Sensing-Lessons Learned, Stuttgart, pp. 241—249.
Furukawa, Y. and Ponce, J., 2010. Accurate, dense, and robust
multi-view stereopsis. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Ma-
chine Intelligence 32(8), pp. 1362-1376.
Gherardi, R., Toldo, R., Garro, V. and Fusiello, A., 2011. Auto-
matic camera orientation and structure recovery with samantha.
In: International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing
and Spatial Information Sciences, ISPRS International Workshop
3D-ARCH, on CD-ROM, Trento, Italy.
Girardeau-Montaut, D., Roux, M., Marc, R. and Thibault, G.,
2005. Change detection on points cloud data acquired with a
ground laser scanner. In: ISPRS Workshop Laser Scanning 2005,
Enschede, the Netherlands.
Gruen, A. and Baltsavias, E., 1998. Geometrically constrained
multiphoto matching. PERS (54(5)), pp. 633-641.
28
Grussenmeyer, P., Landes, T., Voegtle, T. and Ringle, K., 2008.
Comparison methods of terrestrial laser scanning, photogramme-
try and tacheometry data for recording of cultural heritage build-
ings. In: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Re-
mote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXVII
Part B5, pp. 213-218.
Kadobayashi, R., Kochi, R., Otani, N. and Furukawa, R., 2004.
Comparison and evaluation of laser scanning and photogramme-
try and their combined use for digita recording of cultural her-
itage. In: International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote
Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. 35(5), pp. 401-
406.
Lowe, D., 1999. Object recognition from local scale-invariant
features. In: Proc. of the International Conference on Computer
Vision, Corfu, Vol. 2, ICCV, Corfu, Greece, pp. 1150-1157.
Matas, J., Chum, O., Urban, M. and Pajdla, T., 2002. Robust
wide baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions. In:
Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, 2002,
BMVC, Cardiff, UK.
Pierrot-Deseilligny, M. and Paparoditis, N., 2006. A multires-
olution and optimization-based image matching approach: An
application to surface reconstruction from spot5-hrs stereo im-
agery. In: Proc. of the ISPRS Conference Topographic Mapping
From Space (With Special Emphasis on Small Satellites), ISPRS,
Ankara, Turkey.
Remondino, E, El-Hakim, S., Gruen, A. and Zhang, L., July
2008. Turning images into 3-d models. IEEE Signal Process-
ing Magazine pp. 55-64.
Seitz, S., Curless, B., Diebel, J., Scharstein, D. and Szeliski, R.,
2006. A comparison and evaluation of multi-view stereo recon-
struction algorithms. In: CVPR, pp. 519-528.
Snavely, N., Seitz, S. and Szeliski, R., 2008. Modelling the world
from internet photo collections. International Journal of Com-
puter Vision 80(2), pp. 189—210.
Strecha, C., Von Hansen, W., L., V. G., Fua, P. and Thoennessen,
U., 2008. On benchmarking camera calibration and multi-view
stereo for high resolution imagery. In: CVPR, IEEE Computer
Society, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
Triggs, B., McLauchlan, P., Hartley, R. and Fitzgibbon, A., 2000.
Bundle adjustment - a modern synthesis. Lecture Notes in Com-
puter Science 1883, pp. 298-372.
Vedaldi, 2010. http://www.vlfeat.org/~vedaldi/code/
siftpp.html.
AB:
Bric
requ
a ne
The
LiD
The
(Prc
com
RO
poly
line.
and
be f
Suc
No
area
adv.
brid
dist
brid
Mox
on €
LiD
and
moc
cor
elev
mos
our
inte
1.1
Alt
surf
obje
LiD
obje
Fus
LiD
digi
and
Rev
on
extr
ther
