Full text: Technical Commission III (B3)

Wandoo Recovery Group, overall a sight improvement has been 
observed in the wandoo crowns (Whitford et al 2010). 
Whether any increase in cover identified in the imagery is due to 
wandoo crowns improving needs to be validated in the field. 
These locations can be identified in the trend imagery displays. 
4.5 Is the recovery to previous canopy cover? 
The spectral image index utilised represents increasing cover 
with lower index values. Therefore by subtracting the highest 
cover value in image sequence from the 2010 index cover value, 
an image may be produced showing the difference between the 
current cover and the highest cover. Pixel values of zero 
indicate that 2010 is the year of highest cover, and positive 
values the difference. A frequency histogram of the differences 
may be produced. The histogram shows that the majority of 
values are in the range 0 to 30 with an average of 12.58. Using 
information from field sites observed by the authors an index 
value of 12.58 can be related to a projective foliage cover of 
approximately 7%. 2010 is the year of highest cover for 1.5% 
of the total area. 
The cover in wandoo woodland is generally less than 40% 
(Hewett and Underwood 1963). Therefore a difference on 
average of 7% in projected foliage cover between the 2010 
cover and the highest year of cover is considerable. The canopy 
shape of trees recovering from WCD is of a different form to the 
healthy tree. Originally the tree would have a wide canopy with 
leaves at the ends of branches and in recovery this changes to 
clumps of leaves forming along the main branches, these are 
called epicorms. Due to this contraction of the crown during 
WCD and initial recovery, there will probably be a delay in 
canopy recovery being observable in a 25m Landsat pixel. 
4.6 Issues 
Fire impacts will influence the trends and may mask declines 
and recovery attributable to other causes. Due to the scale at 
which fire history data has been collected it is not feasible to 
mask these areas, but where declining trends are identified, any 
fires occurring in the epoch could be attributed to refine the 
analysis. 
Climate and seasonality will affect the cover observed in 
summer. The drying trend of the last ten years may be causing a 
loss of cover, and whether is or isn’t related to WCD is 
unknown. Mercer (2008) did find a trend of decreasing crown 
rating with decreasing rainfall as field sites moved west to east, 
but no relationship with average annual rainfall. 
The image sequence has not been terrain corrected. Although 
the terrain is not rugged, other work in the south west Western 
Australian forests has shown that where there is a difference in 
time of year of a few months subtleties in the cover index 
images are affected. Repeating the analysis with terrain 
corrected imagery would give greater certainty that the 
differences observed were real on ground changes. 
Cloud masking will affect the trend calculation especially the 
four date trends, the areas affected are minimal and no areas 
have less than three dates from which to calculate a trend. 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B3, 2012 
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia 
5. CONCLUSION 
Further investigation could look at other ancillary data such as 
position in landscape. This attribute was found to have a 
significant correlation with WCD in Mercer 2008. Statistical 
analysis of significance of differences between years and epochs 
would direct the interrogation of the results to the most 
important changes. 
This method of interrogating an appropriately processed time 
series of Landsat imagery has proven useful in extending the 
understanding crown declines in the native forests in Western 
Australia. The time periods of canopy loss identified by the 
analysis correlate well with previous surveys and observations. 
Of the field sites visited in 2011 that were wandoo woodland all 
showed signs of previous crown decline and varying levels of 
recovery or lack of. Future field sites to confirm decline impact 
and recovery can be identified from the trend imagery. 
6. REFERENCES 
Brown, P., and Tippett, J. 1986. The role of biotic agents in the 
rural decline of Eucalyptus wandoo Blakely in South-West 
Western Australia. Report prepared by CALM Science Division, 
Como, Western Australia. 
Caccetta, P. A., Campbell, N. A., Evans, F. H., Furby, S. L., 
Kiiveri, H. T. and Wallace, J. F. 2000. Mapping and monitoring 
land use and condition change in the South-West of Western 
Australia using remote sensing and other data, Proceedings of 
the Europa 2000 Conference, Barcelona. 
Capill, L. G. 1984. Wandoo Woodland Conservation. A 
proposal for a system of ecological reserves. Campaign to 
Save Native Forests (W.A.). 
Curry, P., Zdunic, K., Wallace, J. and Law, J. 2008. Landsat 
monitoring of woodland regeneration in degraded mulga 
rangelands: implications of arid landscaped managed for carbon 
sequestration, In: Proceedings 14" Australian Remote Sensing 
and Photogrammetry Conference, Darwin, Australia. 
Draper, N. and Smith, H., 1980. Applied Regression Analysis, 
Second Edition, Wiley: New York, pg. 266. 
Furby, S., Zhu, M., Wu, X. and Wallace J.F. 2008. Vegetation 
Trends 1990-2008 South West Agricultural Region of Western 
Australia, Land Monitor II Project, CSIRO MIS, Available at: 
http://www landmonitor.wa.gov.au/reports/landmon, II/LM2008 
i. VegTrend, 1990. 2008.pdf 
Garkaklis M. and Behn, G. 2009. Assessment of Eucalyptus 
Wandoo (Wandoo) and other tree canopy decline using Landsat 
Trend Analysis, Report to Department of Environment and 
Convservation, Western Australia, pg 15. 
Hewett, P.N. and Underwood, R.J. 1963. The wandoo forest. 
Department of Conservation and Land Management, Woodvale, 
Western Australia. 
Land Monitor, 2012. Land Monitor A project of the Western 
Australian Salinity Action Plan supported by Natural Heritage 
Trust, http://www landmonitor wa.gov.au, [21 Mar 2012]. 
  
    
   
   
   
   
     
    
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
    
     
     
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
    
  
  
  
   
     
   
    
  
  
  
  
   
   
     
   
    
   
  
    
Mani 
Wild 
Mer 
the 
Biol 
Pertl 
Mert 
Rep 
Aust 
Mer 
decl 
beha 
Envi 
Wall 
Nor 
Ima; 
Agri 
http 
Wal 
con 
ima 
Slt 
WR 
CIO 
and 
Ken 
Wil 
Wui 
and 
Wh 
Lan 
Wh 
Cor 
sun 
and 
Zd 
ima 
Sci 
The 
and 
imp 
ass 
Wi
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.