Full text: Technical Commission III (B3)

  
  
No |Method| X; (mm)| Ys (mm)|Zs (mm) Catan) ete) Us oom 
PSO -86.16 -68.67 2434.57] 0.10740, 0.08701. -0.02690, 
Bundle | -437.22} 248.62 3211.53 0.20354 0.03114 -0.02434 
  
  
  
PSO | -171.73| -115.72 2446.62) 0.1315G 0.10620 -0.04050 
  
Bundle | -480.53| -110.84 3144.28 0.21386 0.14294 -0.04888] 
  
PSO | 393.600 18.27 2399.42 -0.07580| 0.05440 0.00240 
  
Bundle | 402.07 -110.92 3176.76 -0.04708 0.14480 -0.00399 
  
PSO | 1020.67 -61.73| 2414.53. -0.34640| 0.07770, 0.04720 
  
Bundle| 1380.78 -98.37 3082.11 -0.37194 0.13500 0.05257 
  
PSO | -184.12| -224.49 2415.21] -0.00880| -0.03830| -0.05280 
  
Bundle | -544.01| -463.28| 3066.80 0.24614 0.25035 -0.08283 
  
PSO |1227.60| -140.33| 2555.88| -0.38700| 0.10990 0.01540 
  
Bundle| 1693.71| -470.83| 3118.71  -0.44186| 0.24396 0.03531 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Table 4. Exterior orientation elements calculated by PSO and 
Bundle adjustment (six control points) 
  
Difference of coordinate Difference of coordinate 
No (mm) No (mm) 
  
  
AX AY AZ AX AY AZ 
  
1 | -0.013| -0.013| 0.009 | 18 | -0.128 | -0.032| 0.336 
  
5 | -0.094| -0.084| -0.174| 21 | 0.006, 0.020, 0.286 
  
8 10.0145] -0.003| 0.053 | 23 | -0.198 | -0.151| 0.329 
  
10 | -0.072| -0.066 | 0.065] 25 | -0.386| -0.160| 0.393 
  
12 | -0.083 | -0.029 | -0.147| 28 | -0.141| -0.095 | 0.782 
  
131 -0.011| 0.040] 0.271] 31 | -0.413| -0.145| 0.685 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Table 5. Difference of check points object coordinates(six 
control points) 
From Table5, the mean square error of three directions are my= 
+0.187mm, my==+0.089mm, mz;==+0.373mm respectively, and 
the point mean square error is mp ==+0.427mm. Under this 
condition, we can obtain the approximate values of exterior 
orientation elements by space resection, but the deviation to 
their real value are too large and lead to misconvergence of 
bundle adjustment. 
6. CONCLUSION 
By using PSO to calculate the approximate values of exterior 
orientation elements, the problem of unavailability of exterior 
orientation elements could be solved due to the decrease in the 
number of control points and narrow space distribution. The 
global searching ability of particle swarm optimization is very 
powerful. In terms of objective function based on the few 
controlling points and the set gross area of exterior orientation 
elements, the approximate values of exterior orientation 
elements can be solved and used in bundle adjustment. This 
method can be applied in real production and experiments, 
which can reduce the procedure of surveying control points and 
increase surveying efficiency. 
40 
7. REFERENCE 
Feng, W.H., 2003. Close-range Photogrammetry. Wuhan 
University Press, Wuhan. 
Guan, Y.L., Cheng, X.J., Zhou, S.J., Liao, ZP.,Lu, T.D., 2008. 
A Solution to space resection based on unit quaternion. Acta 
Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 37(1), pp. 30-35. 
Haralick, R.M., Lee, C.-N., Ottenberg, K. & Nlle, M., 1994. 
Review and analysis of solutions of the three point perspective 
pose estimation problem. International Journal of Computer 
Vision,13 (3), pp.331-356 
Kennedy, J., Eberhart, P., 1995. Particle swarm optimization. In: 
Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural 
Networks, Perth, Australia, Vol4, pp. 1942-1948. 
Parsopoulos, K.E.,Plagianakos, V.P., Magoulas, G.D., Vrahatis, 
M.N., 2001. Advances in Convex Analysis and Global 
Optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The 
Netherlands, pp. 445-457. 
Reynolds, C.W., 1987. Flocks, herds and schools: a distributed 
behavioral model. Computer Graphics (Proceedings of 
SIGGRAPH 87), 21 (4), pp. 25-34. 
Shi, Y., Eberhart, R.C., 1998. A modified particle swarm 
optimizer. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference of 
Evolutionary Computation, Anchorage, Alaska, pp. 69-73. 
Shi, Y., Eberhart, R.C., 1999, Empirical study of particle swarm 
optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference of 
Evolutionary Computation, Washington DC, USA, pp. 1945- 
1950. 
Wang, B.F., Gu,H.C., Huang, G.P., Chen, J.H., 2006. Method 
of calculating  synoptical ^ elements of exterior 
orientation. Journal of Geomatics Science and Technology, 
23(3), pp. 182-184. 
Wei, B., Lin, C., Zheng, Y.K., 2008. Experiment and analysis of 
parameters in particle swarm optimization. Journal of Xihua 
University(Natural Science Edition), 27(1), pp. 76-80. 
Zeng, LC, Jie, Q. Cui ZH. 2004 Particle Swarm 
Optimization. Science Press, Beijing, pp. 9-13. 
Zhang, Y.J, Zhang, Z.X., Zhang, J.Q., 2002.Camera calibration 
using 2D-DLT and bundle adjustment with planar scenes. 
Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 27(6), 
pp. 566-571. 
KE 
1.2 
Bu 
im: 
im: 
as 
det 
res 
ins 
bui 
ha» 
pai 
sot 
PO
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.