International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B4, 2012
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia
processing of multispectral data. Main feature of such
processing is in point correlation from different spectral bands
data. One more feature of such data is low ratio B/H. And we
must estimate possible accuracy of such processing.
3. Experimental results
Calculating RPC for PSS CCD matrixes, accuracy (RMS) of
coefficient calculation for testing area is from 0.000693 to
0.001306 pixels for normalized pixel coordinates.
We use correlation coefficient not less than 0.9 for searching tie
points. Bad tie points excludes in block adjustment of CCD
matrixes for subpixel accuracy of block adjustment. For testing
area we get block adjustment accuracy from 0.1 pixel to 0.8
pixel (RMS) depending from block size. Georeferencing
accuracy for testing area without control points is defined by
navigation system accuracy and in simulation was set for
position — 10 m (RMS) and for orientation angles 10 arc
seconds (RMS) it will be equal to 80-100 m (RMS) on earth
surface. Using additional control points radically increases
block georeference accuracy (see figure 6). One control point
increases georeference accuracy to 18 m (RMS), three control
points decreases error to 4.3 m (RMS), in such case we have
good block adjustment with tie points along and across track.
Accuracy (RMS), m
points
Figure. 6. Georeference accuracy of CCD matrixes block
External orientation accuracy for synthesized coverage with 7
control points is 3.5m.
Relative orientation accuracy of stereopair from multispectral
images for testing area:
RMS: 0.464
Average: 0.397
MAX: 0.834
Points quantity: 30
External orientation accuracy of stereopair with 4 control points
is equal to 26.7 m (RMS).
External orientation accuracy of stereopair with 7 control points
is equal to 17.2 m (RMS).
We compared source digital elevation model (from SRTM data)
which was used for simulated images with calculated DEM.to
Height errors were:
RMS: 21.2 M,
MAX: 32.3M.
4. Discussion
Results of this work may be used as guideline in using of
“Canopus-V” and “BKA” data. Meanwhile we must remember
that this results were get from simulated data. Simulation must
be obligatory in designing of new remote sensing satellites and
simultaneously, processing technologies of data from this
satellites.
5. Conclusions
Results of simulation and accuracy estimation shows, that
panchromatic sensor data of “Canopus-V” satellite may be
recommended to modify maps for the scale 1:25000
Multispectral sensor MSS data may be used to create and
modify maps for scale 1:100000. Using of adjusted block of
CCD matrixes allow to use “Canopus-V” sensor features with
maximum accuracy. Synthesized coverage with RPC
georeference allow to increase productivity of image
processing. We demonstrated possibility of DEM generation in
this work. But because of small ratio B/H it accuracy is not very
high, meanwhile it may be recommended for using in
processing for scales 1:100000 and less.
6. Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Nikonov Oleg - head of remote sensing
department of VNIIEM corporation for his active support of this
work.
References
Vladimirov A.V., Salikhov R.S., Sennik N.A., Zolotoi S.A.,
2008. Space system for operative monitoring of technogenic
and natural emergency situations on base of space complex
“Canopus-V” and Belorussia space satellite. Electrician
problems, 105(1), pp. 49-57.
Nekrasov V.V., Makusheva E.V., 2010. Development of
dynamic geometrical model of shooting of optoelectronic
sensors for perspective space complexes “Canopus-V” type.
Electrician problems, 119(5), pp. 25-30.
Nekrasov V.V., Kravtsova E.V., 2011. Processing technology in
DPS PHOTOMOD images of perspective satellite “Canopus-
V". Geoprofi, 5.2011, cc. 15-18.
134