Full text: Technical Commission IV (B4)

  
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B4, 2012 
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia 
one of which is designed for the visible bands and the second 
for the ultraviolet (UV) wavelengths. At the base of the UV 
optics is a prism that redirects the light to a common CCD 
mounted under the visible optics. Seven narrow-band 
interference filters bonded over the detector array enable the 
acquisition of the color images. 
The camera is designed to operate in two modes: monochrome 
and color. In the monochrome mode (nominally the 643nm 
band) the WAC acquires framelets that have 1024 samples and 
14 lines. In color mode, the WAC acquires framelets for all 
seven bands, however due to limitations in the readout rate of 
the CCD array, only the center 704 samples are read out for 
each 14 line visible band. For the UV framelets, the center 512 
samples are read out of the UV portion of the detector array. 
During the read out, the 512 samples and 16 lines are summed 
in 4 x 4 pixel boxes resulting in a 128 x 4 pixel framelet, which 
increases the signal to noise ratio for the UV bands. 
Due to this configuration, in monochrome mode the WAC has 
a ~90° FOV and in color mode a ~60° FOV. The nadir 
pointing pixels have a pixel scale of 75 meters for the visible 
bands from an altitude of 50 km, while UV bands have a 
pixel scale of 384 meters from the same altitude due to the 
summing. All framelets imaged simultaneously are stored as 
one frame. The WAC repeatedly acquires frames at a rate 
such that each of the narrow framelets overlaps providing 
continuous coverage for each color band. Typical WAC 
observations contain 36 to 1,800 evenly spaced frames. 
  
Figure 2. LROC WAC before spacecraft integration 
2. PRE-LAUNCH CALIBRATION 
Prior to launch, the geometric distortion of both camera systems 
were characterized post-assembly at Malin Space Science 
Systems (MSSS). Each camera was mounted on an Ultradex 
rotary stage that provided “azimuthal” control in one degree 
steps with an accuracy of one arc second. The two NACs 
imaged a bar pattern, while the WAC, with a second rotary 
stage to control the elevation, scanned a collimated spot of 
selectable size over a range of azimuth and elevations. By 
recording the angles of each observation and registering 
them to corresponding pixels in the array, a geometric model 
for each camera was constructed. Each model was defined 
by a focal length, boresight, and radial distortion 
coefficients. After calibration, the NAC was securely mounted 
through the center of the spacecraft’s optical bench using three 
bolts connected near the focal plane. The WAC was mounted on 
the front of the optical bench (+Z, Observation side) on a small 
pedestal to keep the wide FOV clear of all obstructions and to 
offset the radiator from the optical bench. 
3. IN-FLIGHT CALIBRATION 
Accurate placement of NAC and WAC images in a cartographic 
framework requires precise knowledge of the camera 
orientations relative to the spacecraft coordinates and distortion 
of the optics. Using a subset of the vast image dataset collected 
by LROC, improved pointing and distortion parameters were 
derived. This section describes the methodology and 
improvements to the geometric calibration. 
3.1 NAC Pointing Correction 
Due to the twin camera configuration of the LROC NAC, there 
are three components to the geometric calibration: 
1. Absolute twist offset: A rotation about each camera's 
boresight, determined relative to the spacecraft frame. 
2. Absolute offset: The offset of a given map-projected 
pixel from its true coordinates. This is a rotation about 
the two axes perpendicular to the camera's boresight 
(cross-track and down-track). 
3. Relative offset: The  temperature-dependent 
component of the offset between the left (NAC-L) and 
right (NAC-R) cameras. Like the absolute offset, this 
is a rotation about the axes perpendicular to the 
camera's boresight. 
The products of these components were combined to provide a 
precise (seamless NAC-L to NAC-R registration) and accurate 
(within ~20 m to surface coordinates) camera model for 
projecting the immense NAC dataset available to the science 
and engineering community. 
3.1.1 Absolute Twist Correction: The two NAC cameras 
are nominally mounted such that the sensors are parallel to each 
other and perpendicular to the flight direction. Comparison of 
several images of Apollo sites revealed that NAC-L and NAC-R 
images, once projected, were rotated relative to each other 0.36° 
to 0.40° (Figure 3). As an independent check, twist values were 
derived relative to projected Descent Stage of the Apollo Lunar 
Module (LM) and retroreflector locations (in the same image) at 
the Apollo sites: the twist offset was 0.37°. 
The absolute value of each camera rotation relative to the 
spacecraft reference frame was determined by creating a control 
network from over 3,800 polar NAC images [Lee et al., 2012]. 
The orientation of these images varied, making it possible to 
derive a twist adjustment. The average derived absolute 
rotational offsets were -0.24° for the NAC-L and +0.13° for the 
NAC-R, for a relative rotation of 0.37°. 
    
  
  
  
  
  
4 4 fs 
x10 x10 Offset (p) 
-25 -25 
: * 
-3 3 
35 35 
4 4 
45 45 = 
- 
-5 5 
55 5.5 
-6 6 
EN y 
Figure 3. Down-track (left) and cross-track (right) offsets 
between a NAC-L and NAC-R with roughly the same footprint, 
plotted against line and sample, before twist correction. Y-axis 
units are 10* lines. 
430
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.