International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B7, 2012 
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia 
Table 3: Confusion matrix of the FG classification on Salinas benchmark (MNF 20 features, alphabet size: 100). Overall accu- 
racy-81.3692, .7921 Percen are for an easier in ion. 
      
    
      
see 
Table 4: Confusion matrix of the FG classification on Salinas benchmark (MNF 20 features, alphabet size: 100, feature median 5 x 5 es 
filtering). Overall 5.3217, .8358 Percen are gi for an easier i on. 
see