Full text: Technical Commission VII (B7)

Relevance of airborne lidar and multispectral image data for 
urban scene classification using Random Forests, ISPRS 
Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66(1): 56-66. 
Haala, N. and Walter, V., 1999. Automatic classification of 
urban environments for database revision using lidar and color 
aerial imagery, International Archives of Photogrammetry and 
Remote Sensing, Vol. 32, Part 7-4-3 W6, Valladolid, Spain, 3-4 
June, 1999. 
Horning, N., 2010. Random Forests: An Algorithm for Image 
Classification and Generation of Continuous Fields Data Sets. 
Proceeding of International Conference on Geoinformatics for 
Spatial Infrastructure Development in Earth and Allied 
Sciences . 
Jensen, J.R., 2005. Introductory Digital Image Processing, 3rd 
Ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N. 
Joelsson, R., Benediktsson, A. and Sveinsson, R., 2008. 
Random Forest Classification of Remote Sensing Data. In: C. 
Chen, ed. Image Processing For Remote Sensing. Boca Racon, 
FL: CRC Press, pp. 61-78. 
1962. IEEE 
pattern | discrimination, 
Julesz, B. Visual 
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B7, 2012 
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia 
   
Transaction on Information Theory, 8:84-92. 
Perona P., and Malik, J., 1990. Scale-space and edge detection 
using anisotropic diffusion, IEEE Transactions on Pattern 
Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12 (7): 629—639. 
Stumpf, A. and Kerle, N., 2011. Object-oriented mapping of 
landsides using Random Forests, Remote Sensing of 
Environment, 115:2564-2577. 
Wang, X., Waske, B. and Benediktsson, A., 2009. Ensemble 
Methods for  Spectral-spatial Classification of Urban 
Hyperspectral Data. In Proceedings of IGARSS, Volume 4, pp. 
944-947. 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
This study was financially supported by a NSERC discovery 
grant that was awarded to Prof. Dr. Jonathan Li at the 
University of Waterloo. 
  
39 Features 
48 Features 
    
    
Kappa = 0.551 Kappa =0.565 
36 Features | 30 Features 
  
Kappa =0.573 _ Kappa =0.689 
  
  
26 : Features 22 
       
Abe 
b | a 
a =0.681 
  
Kappa =0.756 
Kapp 
  
    
  
15 Features 
  
  
Kappa =(.726 
  
  
Figure 5. the Maximum Likelihood classification results based on feature selection of Random Forests 
  
  
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.