International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B7, 2012 
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia 
  
   
   
  
    
  
  
  
    
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
   
   
  
  
  
  
   
Figure 14. Comparison between profiles (test 2) 
M Figure 11. 3Dview of DEM 
92 a 
  
In the second test in the Fasano area we verified that there is a 
substantial congruence of the Dem extracted with aerial 
71 photogrammetric method and the LIDAR one. 
  
  
54 Zomparizan Brof Lidae Phobos smmeiric 
  
  
  
  
  
Figure 15. Zoom on new building (test 2) 
The map of the height difference clearly shows the areas for 
amendment of the land as highlighted in white in Figures 16 
and in Figures 17. 
  
  
  
  
17 Figure 12. Comparison between profiles (test 2) 
Comparison Fret Lidy - Phatagranossivis 
    
Figure 16. Differences between two DEMs (test 2) 
  
  
   
Figure 13. Comparison between profiles (test 2)