International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B7, 2012
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia
From the visual analysis, we can see that the DTM constructed
during winter from the discrete return pulses was very smooth.
However, still there were some topographically complex areas
where the ground penetration was not enough to create a
smooth DTM (blue circle). The smooth DTM could be obtained
even at those places by using full waveform return pulses.
Naturally, the ground point detected from the full waveform
return pulses obtained during winter created the smoothest and
the most accurate DTM.
4. CONCLUSION
The results showed that the technique used for the full
waveform exploitation has effectively increased the ground
penetration by 50 % and 20%, respectively, during autumn and
winter in the mixed forest hilly region compared to the discrete
return pulses.
The accuracy evaluation of LiDAR derived terrain data showed
that, in the hilly regions, where the ground elevation changes
considerably within a short horizontal distance, increase in
ground point detection, due to the full waveform point cloud
during autumn significantly improved the accuracy of DTM
estimation. The results showed that, during leaf on condition,
by implementing the proposed full waveform exploitation
technique, better estimation of bio mass together with accurate
DTM generation could be achieved concurrently compared to
the discrete LiDAR pulses.
During winter, when the deciduous trees shed their leaves, the
vertical accuracy of DTM constructed from discrete LIDAR and
full waveform LiDAR was very similar. However, still there
were some topographically complex areas where the ground
penetration due to discrete LIDAR pulses alone was not enough
to create a smooth DTM. Still at those places, smoother DTM
was obtained by using full waveform return pulses.
References:
Chauve, A., Durrieu, S., Bretar, F., Pierrot-Deseilligny, M., &
Puech, W., 2007. Processing full-waveform lidar data to extract
forest parameters and digital terrain model: validation in an
alpine coniferous forest. In: Proceedings of ForestSat,
Montpellier, France.
Hodgson, M. E., Jensen, J. R., Schmidit, L., Schill, S., & Davis,
B., 2003. An evaluation of LIDAR- and IFSAR —derived
digital elevation models in leaf-on conditions with USGS Level
1 and Level 2 DEMs. Remote Sensing of Environment, 84, pp.
295-308.
Persson, À., Sóderman, U., Tópel, J., & Ahlberg, s., 2005.
Visualization and analysis of full-waveform airborne laser
scanner data. In: /SPRS WGIII/3, III/4, V/3 Workshop "Laser
scanning 2005”, Enschede, the Netherlands, pp 103-108.
Pirotti, F., 2011. Analysis of full-waveform LiDAR data for
forestry applications: a review of investigation and method.
iForest — Biogeoscience and Forestry, pp 100-106.
Reitberger, J., Schnórr, Cl., Heurich, M., Krzystek, P., & Stilla,
U., 2008. Towards 3D mapping of forests: A comparative
study with first/last pulse and full waveform lidar data. In: The
509
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing
and Spatial Information Sciences, Beijing, China, Vol. XXXVII,
Part B8, pp. 1397-1403.
Wong, H., & Antoniou, A., 1994. One-dimensional signal
processing techniques for airborne laser bathymetry. IEEE
Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 32, pp 35-46.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Japan forestry agency's digital
forest information development project for supporting this
research.