1d assess
est enor-
10t suffi-
a global
| or local
lent sys-
ers' net-
satellite
tures for
e to this.
est status
thematic
| without
'Ocessing
he fields
are non
ind clear
'Ocessing
/hich are
truments
idvanced
s in the
ALIS ©
ow) will
rease the
sensing
but also
inator, a
which is
er to the
> Federal
istry of
as direct
ie GMFS
d for a
chnology
n Sudan
, to the
ment of
ring and
ue, since
low, the
in impact
ie to this,
and inter
MFS was
Steering
t Remote
onitoring
a scale of
SAR data
onitoring
> map of
| scale of
imagery
nation to
rvey and
International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B8, 2012
XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August — 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia
i Reception | iii gi T ;
i viaftp : i i
pert. |
| Orthorectification :
Extraction IAPAR |
utpat
foG fAPAR SD | Cartographic |
Figure 1 Indicative fAPAR map Processing Chain
The processing chain developed in the frame of GMFS is de-
picted schematically in fig. 1 and shows that there are ongoing
remote sensing data from the MERIS FR level 2 products and
the data from the top of atmosphere band introduced into the
processing chain. The GIS operations, with spatial data from
the project data base concerning orthorectification and different
reference layers, allow the creation of the cartographic output
of the mid September situation in a short time already in Sep-
tember, well before the beginning of the harvest period in Oc-
tober.
Figure 2 ALIS O interface for
the GMFS CuA processing.
The creation of the annual cultivated area map uses the ALIS ©
software interface developed in the frame of the GMFS project,
of which a screenshot is displayed in fig. 2.
2.3 Application Sites in the Sudan and beyond
The remote sensing community has developed a bundle of wor-
thy tools for change detection of land cover which have grown
beyond academic research into stable and reproducible applica-
tion instruments. These achievements have been the precondi-
tion for the transfer of technology into the regional application
in African administrative environments. This transfer was one
of the driving goals for the European Space Agency (ESA) to
start the project series of “Global Monitoring for Food Security
in Africa” (GMFS) ten years ago. GMFS is part of ESAs con-
tribution to the European Union / ESA Global Monitoring for
Environment and Security (GMES) programme. It is the main
European GMES Service Element in support of food security
monitoring systems with remote sensing and GIS applications
serving the food security sector in African countries like Sene-
gal, Mali, Niger, Sudan, Ethiopia, Malawi, Zimbabwe and Mo-
zambique. A consortium of seven European R&D partners (see
acknowledgements) jointly developed technical specifications
and methodological improvements in remote sensing applica-
tions to early warning, biomass forecast, agricultural mapping,
change maps, soil moisture indicators and agro statistical sur-
vey. All these efforts were brought together into for training
and implementation modules, together with the local partner
organisations in the agro environmental administrations of the
participating countries.
The GMFS Service Portfolio is structured into three top-level
service types. The agricultural monitoring service type provides
processing routines to assess total planted crop land and its
variability from one year to another with specific emphasis on
the traditional rain fed agriculture production in Sudan. Agri-
culture production in Sudan is largely depending on seasonal
variability and distribution, intensity, duration and period of
rains. Large areas in the central Sudan are depending on tradi-
tional rain fed agriculture with the cropping of Sorghum and
Millet mainly for personal consumption. This causes high vul-
nerability of a certain part of the Sudanese population. About
60% of the Sudanese population are living in rural areas with an
average population density of 14-17 people per km?.
The set up of a robust monitoring scheme was initiated during
the past decades with a number of attempts, upon which the
FMoA could elaborate a basis on how to usefully integrate Re-
mote Sensing technologies with ground observations. In the
past, however, those failed due to political reasons. Recent
elaborations from GMFS demonstrated a huge progress in
monitoring cultivated areas.
But, and there the general difficulties of monitoring the tradi-
tional rain fed areas cross the limitations of Remote Sensing,
the electromagnetic characteristics of the traditional rain fed
crops and the timely development over the crop season is
hardly to distinguish from natural vegetation or fallow land
vegetation. Tests were carried out to apply new generations of
sensors, such as very high resolution radar and optical with cer-
tain improvements. But operationability could not be achieved
due to the non-availability of multi time series data on the ad-
ministrative reporting level which is the level of federal states
in Sudan (see fig. 3).
— NKOR North Kordofan
B
Nos Finat boundaries «f Auiae See nat yet asia: ies
Figure 3 Localization of actual Test site in Sudan
(North Kordofan state, approx. 240,000km?)
The recent GMFS Agricultural Mapping processes must be
adopted and enhanced with additional routines and more in
depth context knowledge from Sudanese experts in order to bet-