| Table 1: Orientation elements of the images of the network arrangement of 
, | Figure 2 
4 | X Y Z 
3 | Images C 9 9 9 E ? i 
d 3 [an] | [n] | [mi | [ni | [9] [9] [s] 
E 0 100 0 0 5 0 0 0 
E | 1 100 -1 0 5 0 0 ‚0 
8 | 2 100 1 0 5 0 0 0 
5 | 3 100 -5 0 5 0 -20.483 0 
: | 2 100 5 0 5 0 20.483 0 
E | 5 100 0 0 4 0 0 0 
Es | 6 100 0 0 6 0 0 0 
| 7 100 0 0 0 0 0 20.483 
8 100 0 0 10 0 0 -20.483 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
While the object points and the control distribution remains unchanged in the 
following computational versions, the images are grouped as seen from Table 2. 
For simplification all versions are computed without additional parameters and 
n with fixed control points (diag (Pode =). 
| Table 2: Image arrangements and global accuracy and reliability indicators 
AT(X3, NT(YYJ,PATUZ), A(T), RINx'), RI(y'), RI(T); g. = 1 um 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Image i ek quienes Re ny, indic. 
Version|arrange-| n u Y AI( 0) AT(Y 2)! A 
JRI( 
ment n] | [mm] Pi MM 1x ino ) 
A 1-2 108 | 69 3910-77 nu 10.27 10.57 | 0.19 [5553 var 
B 3-4 108 | 69 39.1:0.09 ho 9 0.11 st 0.20 [0557 13.3 
C 3-0-4 162 | 75 87 | 0.08 | eu [o5 0.43 [064 [0.54 
D 1-2-5-6-]216 ^81 1135-]-0- 18 [9 92 ris Né 0.62 [0:62 LE 
E 3-4-7-8 | 216 | 81 | 135 | 0.07 | © 21 {9-07 j 0.12 0.62 19.42 [9242 
n = number of observations 
u = number of unknowns 
r = n-u = redundancy 
RIO Figure 3: Global reliability and 
E, CD accuracy indicators of the 
O6 T — SAL m -— 
s Co practical examples of Table 2 
BO oA 
0.1+ 
BE + {> 
  
  
01 0s AIT)