e
Transform image coordinates
" from comparator to photo system for
oto 1 > ; ; ;
p (x, Yız) and photo 2 (X55; Y54)
|
Compute trans. parameters
for photo 2 to photo 1
|
Compute trans. parameters
for photo 1 to object-space
Transform photo 2 coordinates (x,
oy)
X53:Y24)
to photo 1 coordinate system (
|
Loop to A for all (x
! ny
then all (Kai
|
Compute preliminary object-
space coordinates (a 5» Yig)
Compute tj
|
Recompute object-space
coordinates*(X. Y.) using Z..
1J iJ 1J
|
Apply refraction corrections
Compute x and y
components of
Displacement vectors
Figure 4. General Steps In the Analytical Solution
for three rotation parameters of. of and Kf, and three
translation parameters xs, Y^ and 2 of photo 1.
Eleven control points are used in the solution.
The parameters wf, 4j, KT» xt. Y, and Z$ are then
used to compute loe Object space coordinates of the
image points in photo l. The three dimensional projec-
tive transformation equations are used in a two-step
solution. Let X13 and y1; represent the image coordi-
nates of point jin phoit 1; and xj;, Y,; and Zi
represent the corresponding object Space" coordinates
of the same point. Because of the deflection of the
glass plate, the cross-sectional surface of the model
is no longer a planar surface and Z-coordinates will
not be all equal to zero. In the first step, approxi-
mate values of the X1j and Y4: coordinates are compu-
ted by assuming that Z1; -Q* These approximate co-
ordinates are then used lo compute the actual Z-
deflection of the glass plate. This is accomplished
by using an inverse-weighted distance function and the
four nearest data points obtained from strain gauge
measurements. The Z1; coordinate is then used to re-
compute the X13 and Y1j coordinates of point j.
15
The object space coordinates X2j, Y2j and Zp; of the
same point j after a certain movement of the construc-
tion shield are then computed from photo 2. Let x5j
and 24 represent the photo coordinates of point j
measured from photo 2. These coordinates are first
transformed to the photo 1 system using the orientation
parameters Wp, $2, Ko, X2, Y7 and Z2. This step cor-
rects for the effects of any movement of the camera
between exposures. Let x4; and Y2j represent the trans-
formed photo coordinates if point j. Then the corre-
sponding object space coordinates Xois Yay and Z2j
are computed using the orientation parameters oT,
$T. «T, Xf, YT and Zf and the same procedure as that.
described in hu above paragraph. The computed coordi-
nates X15, Y]. X2; and Yo; are then corrected for
refraction. The refraction correction, dX and dY, for
the coordinates X1; and nj are computed from the
following expressiüns:
y = tan’! (xi X5)/01j - Yf)) (2)
is
a7 tan (X - PL + (YY - hp] Tj
j)
(3)
8 - Sin" (Sin a/N) (4)
d = T(tan o - tan 8) (5)
dX s d.«- Sin (6)
dY = d * Cos y (7)
Xj 7 X4j * dX (8)
Vig = Yi; + OY (9)
where N is the index of refraction, and T is the :
thickness of the glass plate. The movement of point j
in the X and Y directions during the time interval
between the two exposures are then computed as the
changes in the corrected coordinates, i.e.
AX = Xb; - Xi (10)
AVE Yl 7 94 (11)
Since the displacement vectors are in numerical form,
many different graphical illustrations can be directly
generated from the computer. Figure 5 is an example of
a CALCOMP plot of the movement vectors at points around
the tunnel model. Figure 6 is a contour plot of the
movement in the X-direction during one test. Every
point on the same contour line has the same amount of
movement. Figure 7 is a contour plot of the movement
in the Y-direction. Both of these contour plots were
generated directly from the computed movement vectors
by the computer. Figure 8 is a profile plot of the y-
displacement at a distance R above the center lines of
two parallel tunnels, where R is the radius of the
tunnel. Figure 9 is a profile plot of the correspon-
ding x-displacement. Contour plots can also be gene-
rated to study the distribution of strain and stress
throughout the cross-sectional area of the model.
ACCURACY ANALYSIS
In order to test the overall accuracy of the method,
two photographs were taken of the tunnel model in its
undisturbed position. These two photographs were then
measured and analysed as a pair of "before" and "after"
photographs. Figure 10 is a plot of the computed dis-
placement vectors which, in fact, are measurement
errors. If the system of measurement was totally free
of error, there would have been zero displacement at
anywhere within the model area. The average value of
the 84 vectors in Figure 10 amounted to 0.04 mm, and
the standard deviation was + 0.09 mm.
Listed in Table 1 are the means and standard devia-