SI
=
OS“ rt (D (D oo o MD
)r
11
ns
1e
or
al
1e
275
The choice of components for composition of an information collection system
includes a wide range of instruments: classical analog instruments,
stereocompilers, analytical plotters, digitally controlled orthophoto and
stereo-orthophoto generators; equipment for automation of processes, and an
assortment of computing devices and interactive display and editing
facilities. It is evident that, from these components, a number of
differently configured systems may be built for the achievement of the same
objective. In principle the choice of processes and the choice of
instruments for the performance of these processes will depend mainly on the
constraints imposed by criteria such as the required accuracy and speed, and
by factors related to the economical constraints and the constraints imposed
by human resources. In principle, there are two extreme approaches in the
structural composition of the components. One is based on fully
decentralized processes where the components are not physically connected and
there is no possibility for a direct flow of information between the
components. The other extreme is the fully centralised approach where the
components are physically connected and the transfer of intermediate
information between components is an internal transaction. Between these two
fully off-line and fully on-line structures of the system, there is a number
of possible configurations of components and sub-systems. Only one of these
will be optimal for a particular set of constraints.
In practice the macro structure of the system will normally comprise two
subsystems: the control densification subsystem and the subsystem for
compilation of detailed information. The latter subsystem may be further
subdivided into two parts: one for the collection of information on elevation
and the. other for. the collection of. information. on. features. (i.e.
planimetry). :
A significant influence ‚on the configuration of the information collection
system will also be the form chosen for the source information record. At
present, due to the requirements for reliable information of high metric
quality, the only acceptable input for the control densification subsystem is
the original analog photographic record acquired by precise, well-controlled
photogrammetric frame cameras from airborne platforms. For the compilation
subsystem, besides the original photograph, its derivatives: the orthophotos
and stereo-orthophotos may be considered.
The most efficient control densification subsystem is the one based on
analytical plotters with a special software package for on-line, analytical
aerial triangulation. If this subsystem is on-line with the main computing
and external storage facilities of the land information system the collected
information can be fed directly into these. After the execution of block
adjustments, the adjusted coordinates of control points and the orientation
parameters can be stored in "control files" accessible to the analytical
instruments of the compilation subsystems (i.e. to analytical plotters or
analytical scanner-printers for generation of digital terrain models,
orthophotos and stereo-orthophotos) for restoration of models without the
repetition of exterior orientation processes (Kratky, 1982). The alternative
to an analytical plotter based control densification subsystem would be a
comparator-based subsystem. This subsystem may also be in an on-line
configuration with the computing and storage. facilities. of. the. land
information system but the advantages of this configuration are negligible.
It should be noted that the analytical plotter based subsystem for control
densification may be readily converted into a compilation subsystem for
collection of detailed information (by the application software). This
cannot be done with a comparator-based subsystem for control densification.