jo 
Average For All Non-Control Points 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
f. of Simulated block! |Sudbury City Block?|Industry block? average 
rays e2x, ely 
(any block) 
Ty f ex ery Tx Ly p bs 89) r. ex ey 
2 0.00/|[0.40/|0.97/0.53/|0.00/[0.42/|1.00/[0.50/|0.00/0.41/|0.95|0.55 0.750 
3 [0.33/|0.43/|0.67/|0.33/|0.24|0.38/|0.67/|0.33|0.44|0.37/|0.43|0.57 0.500 
4 0.48|0.55/|0.36/|0.39|0.44/|0.43|0.38/|0.37/|0.52/|0.44|0.31|0.44 0.375 
5 0.54|0.56|0.28|0.32/|0.45/|0.48|0.35]0.25| — | — | — | = 0.300 
1. 52 photographs, dense points. 
2. 55 photographs, regular urban large scale block. 
3. 4 convergent close-range photographs. 
Table 1: Average values for r and e, (non control points) 
Block/Case no. of rays no. of distances original ry ry 
Simulated A 3 2 0.18(X) 0.53 
B 3 2 0.43(Y) 0.50 
C 4 2 0.56(X) 0.69 
Close Range D 2 1 0.00(X) 0.13 
E 2 2 0.00(X) 0.71 
F 2 3 0.00(X) 0.90 
G 2 4 0.00(X) 0.77 
H 4 2 0.67(X) 0.90 
Table 2: Effect of Distances on Redundancy Numbers 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Adjusted Object Coordinates (in mm) 
  
Block/Case without distances with distances 
X Y Z X Y 2 
Simulated A 162 170 296 14 111 257 
B 92 134 41 -12 116 49 
e 127 22 -55 18 3 -16 
Close Range D -9 -67 31 -4 -65 32 
E 16 -33 -16 -2 3 
F -4 -56 29 0 0 =2 
G -22 -50 25 -2 2 -1 
H 2 -3 2 0 0 0 
Table 3: Effect of 100um Image Error On