Full text: 16th ISPRS Congress (Part B1)

  
deblurring ratio is. As general, if we want to get a good de- 
blurring effect,we must choose a smaller ratio of the reference 
beam to the object beam,the modulations of the fringes are very 
low, so the efficiency of the filter is small.' But'in © this new 
System, the inverse filtering function can be got automatically 
with the help of the mask. We only choose the ratio R/Ajaccord- 
ing to the linear recording condition, so we can get higher mo- 
dulation interference fringes.The other methods can not compare 
with this method in efficiency. And it is verified by  experi- 
ments that there are big differences in efficiency if different 
photographic condition is used. So it isveryv important to  op- 
timize the recording and processing conditions. 
3°. The anti-noise property 
The holographic system is damaged by various noise, espe- 
cially the granularity noise due to random aggregations of the 
silver grains in the emulsion. Heistrom developed an expression 
for the optimum filter function, when random zero-mean,additive 
noise is present. As the criterion for best filtering,the prin- 
ciple of the least mean-squares is used in his derivation. The 
optimum fiiter function is 
Po / ® 2 
Qo / D +1/ IH} 2 
where ¢, , 9, are the power spectra of the noise distribution and 
the image respectively. He showed that the smaller the 9,/9, is, 
the stronger the noise is restrained. From part II we can give 
an another form of our filter 
2XfR / Ao 1 
| *(OCf2R7/A/|C,H |? C,-H 
here ^| 9$4/9«9« A4? f£? (R/Ao )? 40.0014 (for à 6328A, f - 600mm, R/As 1/10), 
it is very small. So the filter we have got is optimal with 
respect to the additive noise. 
Another advantage of this system is that the output image 
is composed of N pictures. So the SNR of N-channel filtering 
system is increased by N times than that of a single one. The 
affection of the system noise is decreased greatly. 
t=H" (18) 
  
(19) 
Le = 
V. Experimental 
The linear motion blur image(Fig.2a) simulated in the labo- 
ratory and the blurred remote-sensing image (Fig.2b) were pro- 
cessed by this: system.The over all Gammas of two blurred images 
were controlled to be 2 approximately. So that their amplitude 
transmittances are proportional to the irradiation  distribu- 
tions of the blurred objects. 
The image shown in Fig.2b was the deblurred one of  Fig.2a 
using the 3-channel inverse filtering system. The sharpness of 
the restored picture was improved greatly and most of the de- 
tails blurred was almost restored. 
Fig.2 is the restored remote sensing image. In order to 
evaluate the capacity of the filtering system, we chose a part 
of the resolution test marks from an aero-photograph. From the 
ratio of ground speed to the flight height (V/H) of the  aero- 
plane as well as other references the blur width was figured 
out, which was 100um. If we observe this photo directly, the 
42
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.