Full text: XVIIth ISPRS Congress (Part B3)

the 
the 
nly 
ced 
ind 
nts 
rith 
yia- 
rge 
10a 
nt, 
iri- 
by 
ing 
are 
me 
ine 
im- 
In 
s a 
the 
re- 
Drs. 
ria- 
for 
age 
in 
lish 
' of 
of 
ard 
de- 
ced 
ible 
ard 
ces 
tro- 
ve- 
f a 
7, if 
| is 
ine 
ion 
lar 
tric 
rith 
are 
5 if 
the 
lity 
on 
are 
on- 
in 
precise and reliable 3D line parameters, especially for 
those lines which are nearly parallel to the epipolar 
plane, as their position in 3D will be fixed through the 
intersection with other lines in two line points. 
The introduction of a local coordinate sytem for the 
geodetic method caused that no absolute coordinates 
could be compared. The organisation of further tests 
should be done in such a way, that this is possible. A 
further point of criticism is, that not the real epipolar 
angle in image space was used but an approximation, 
the angle EPI. Therefore it was not possible to check 
the vertical lines in respect to the variation of the 
epipolar angle. 
Our opinion is, that line photogrammetry can be used 
with advantage as a tool for the calculation of man- 
made objects after semi- or fully automatic localisation 
of such objects in digital images. Therefore, and caused 
by the promising results achieved in the tests done 
here, investigations concerning the extraction of image 
points for line photogrammetry using matching or 
other segmentation methods in digital images will be 
done in the future. Furthermore, all theoretically 
derived constraints will be implemented and more 
complex features will be tested in respect to their appli- 
cability for this method. 
6. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 
This project was made possible by the financing by the 
department for photogrammetry at the Royal Institute 
of Technology, Stockholm Sweden. The author would 
like to express his gratitude to Prof. Dr. Kennert 
Torlegärd for his guidance in this project. I also like to 
thank Lars-Âke Edgardh and Anders Boberg for their 
useful cooperation. 
7. REFERENCES 
1 Lugnani,]. B., 1982. The Digitized Features - A New 
Source of Control. In: Int. Congress of Photogram- 
metry and Remote Sensing., Taniemi-Japan, Vol. 
XXIV Supplement, pp. 188 - 202 
2 Masry, S. E., 1981. Digital Mapping Using Entities: A 
New Concept. Photogrammetric Engineering and 
Remote Sensing. Vol 48(11): 1561-1599. 
3  Mulawa, D. C., Mikhail, E.M., 1988. Photogram- 
metric Treatment of Linear Features. In: Int. 
Congress of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing., 
Kyoto-Japan, Vol. 27 Part B10, pp. 383 -393. 
4 Persson, B., 1985. Linjefotogrammetri. Department 
of Photogrammetry, Royal Institute of Technology, 
Stockholm Sweden. Unpublished. 
5  Sayed, A. N., Mikhail, E.M, 1990. Extraction And 
Photogrammetric Exploitation Of Features In 
Digital Images. Report CE-PH-90-7, School Of Civil 
Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, 
USA 
675 
8. FIGURES 
10 = 10 
© 6 
> 4 $ 
> i 
ke] A 7 4 
& 6 
o S. 0i « Mi 
g 8 
: NE i: 
& 001 T 
12345678910112 1.2 3456 78 
line number line number 
Figure 3a: Figure 3b: 
Figure 3a and 3b shows the results from test case a for 
building A and B respectively The columns show the 
mean of the standard deviation of the estimated angles 
ô, ©, Y with (black) and without (white) the introduc- 
tion of the geometric constraints. Line 1 to 8 of buil- 
ding A and line 1 to 4 of building B are horizontal. The 
vertical lines are line 7 to 12 for building A and 5 to 8 
for building B. 
f J f À 
> > 
zo NT 
N N 
001 001 
123456789101112 123455871 
line number line number 
Figure 4a: Figure 4b: 
Figures 4a and 4b shows the same test case as shown in 
3a and 3b, but with the standard deviations of the esti- 
mated metric parameter r instead of the angles 8, q, y. 
  
  
[gon] 
e 
[gon] 
= 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
mean of sdev. 
= 
T 1 
> >» 
L m 
> > 
» > ++ 
> 
> d» 
mean of sdev 
01 or T v ¥ 01 T T T re 
0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 
angle EPI [gon] angle EPI [gon] 
Figure 5a Figure 5b: 
Figure 5a and b: Measurements from test case b where 
the mean of the standard deviations of the angles 8, q, 
y are plotted, as a function of angle EPI. Results 
without geometric constraints are plotted using crosses 
(+) and triangels (A) are used for cases with constraints. 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.