ng
e,
by
np
]se
on
ch
ler
ee
he
list
very useful for remotely sensed image.
3.2 Region relation formation
On the synthetic land unit map, each region is the
Structure of a matrix or a rectangular raster and the
relations between regions cann" t easily be judged, so
we introduce the region relation representation.
At first, we defined an image or digital map as
complex with a label assigned to each complex element
. The label originate from the gray values measured
during the scanning of an image. The region then is
formed in accordance with the corresponding notion of
the subcomplex (V * A * Kovalevsky ,1988).
Because the complex labing image is still represented
in raster form ,to obtain topological information , we
transform the complex into a data structure called the
correlation list . It consists of o — dimensional, ] —
dimensional, and 2 — dimensional topological sublists
(Guan, 1990).
With the description of correlation list, appropriate
region relation graph (see Figure 5a) and region
relation list. (see Figure 5 b)can be made to represent
the relations between regions.
In the relation list ,a; ,a; are the labels, identifying the
relations between regions such as adjacency ,parallel
etos,
€ A|B|C|D/|---
A Alla |0]0]-
B Bjai|1][laila
| [Em 0 E clofaf1]o0
Dj01lal0!11]--.
£j
a Region relation graph
b Region relation list
Figure 5. Region relation representation
3.9 Image interpretation
The organization flowchart in Figure 6 gives an
overview of the procedure to use a computer system to
interpret an image based on multlevel representation
tree. Reference to Figure 7,the object interpretation
881
precedure is briefly described as follows.
1) Form segmentation image and digital maps.
2) Construct synthetic land unit map.
3) Construct correlation list , region relation list ,land
unit relatability list and attribute list.
4) Construct a knowledge base which consists of
different types of knowledge such as geometric,
topologic ,spatial related knowledge etc.
5) If only one interpretation is found by matching the
image features and rule hypotheses, the interpretation
will be assigned to the image region ,or the knowledge
base is revised or more information extracted from
image and auxiliary data must be acquired.
6) If there is no information and knowledge to specify
the interpretation further, assign the image a
ambiguous interpretation class.
Acquisition of image
and auxiliary
data
es
Segmentation
Synthetic land
image unit map
| [4
|
Construction of
. ; à Construction of
correlation list Construction of >
[^] "land unit
and region relation attribute list
relatability list
list
n
Construction of
knowledge base
Revise rules nterpretation
js determinate
Input interpretation
class
Figure 6. A procedure to interpret an image based
on multilevel representation tree.
For example ,in Figure 7 region R; of segmentation