OWS, 
with | Perceptibility 
| ; Perceptibility: ^ houses 
nnot very good | locical 1: 10 000 i 
red ( c NN ecolocical map 1: Ds 
  
     
   
        
  
  
  
ures Hr — 
allic combined class 
Il as | 
re a | medium 
for | | 
P bar soil 
low | 
  
Figure 6: Perceptibilty of an ecological map versus a 
Spot classification. 
| 4. REFERENCES 
DOYLE, F. 1975: Cartographic Presentation of 
Remote Sensor Data, Manual of Remote Sensing, pp. 
1077-1106. 
| KONECNY, G. and Bähr, H.-P., 1979: Einsatz 
Photogrammetrioscher Kameras aus dem Weltraum 
für kartographische Anwendungen 
KONECNY, G., SCHUHR, W., ENGEL, H. and 
LOHMANN, P., 1984: Topographic Mapping from 
Space Borne Metric Camera Imagery. International 
Arch. f. Photogr. and R.S., Vol. XXV, Part A4, pp. 
157-161. 
KONECNY, G., SCHUHR, ^W. ENGEL, H. 
LOHMANN, P., SCHUERING, A. and WU, J, 
1984: Investigation of Metric Camera Data Quality, 
Intern. Arch. f. Photogr. + R.S. ,Vol. XXV, Part Al, 
pp. 64-69. 
KONECNY, G. and SCHUHR, W., 1985: Linemap 
production with Metric Camera Data, ESA 
Symposium Proceedings, SP-233, pp 69-73. 
KONECNY, G. and SCHUHR, W., 1988: Reliability 
of Radar Image Data, Intern. Arch. f. Photogr. + R.S. 
Vol. XXVII, Part B9, pp I-93-101. 
KRUCK, E. and LOHMANN, P., 1986: Aerial 
Triangulation of CCD Line-Scanner Images, ESA 
Symposium Proceedings. 
SCHROEDER, M, SCHUHR,  W. and 
SCHUERING, A.1985: Line mapping and 
Resolution Tests with Metric Camera Data, ESA 
Symposium Proceedings, SP-209, pp 87-90. 
457