LOW-COST FEATURE EXTRACTION FROM AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS FOR DATABASE REVISION
T. Bouloucos, R. Kunarak, K. Tempfli
ABSTRACT:
With the advent of geographic information systems,
important means for acquiring spacial data.
photogrammetric methods have become once more an
paper describes a comparative study of digital
monoplotting, using standard PC equipment, and stereoplotting using a low-cost analytical plotter, both
in the context of GIS. The functionality of the methods for different application fields is evaluated.
KEY WORDS: Monoplotting, Database
Interpretability.
INTRODUCTION
Digital spatial data handling systems are widely
used. Map making, map updating and the collection
and production of geoinformation is no longer the
domain of specialists of a certain discipline but
of all professionals who need spatial data for
their particular applications.
Adequate data collection remains critical.
Up-to-date spatial data acquired from recent
imagery can provide appropriate geoinformation.
Several types of sensors and platforms are used
for this purpose. Satellite imagery and near
vertical aerial photographs are used mainly for
making and updating maps. Satellite data are
usually gathered in digital form and thus can be
directly processed digitally. Standard aerial
survey cameras record images on photographic film;
digital | cameras are not yet widely used in
airborne surveys.
Database revision using aerial photographs implies
several operations, including interpretation,
detection of changes, digitization and
transformation to a reference coordinate system
before the data can be integrated into an existing
database. The process of interpretation can be
performed prior to or simultaneously with
digitization. Feature extraction can be realized
by either stereoplotting or digital monoplotting;
both methods yield digital output and can be used
with any terrain type.
Revision processes are required by users such as
natural resource scientists, urban planners, etc,
who are not professional map producers. The low
utilization rates of photogrammetric systems make
low-cost solutions appealing, but even for
professional map makers low-cost systems may be of
interest since revision requires interpretation,
and thus rather long idle times for equipment.
Being a low-cost system, digital monoplotting has
become very popular, especially in "thematic
disciplines". On the other hand, analytical
plotters have become cheaper and easier to use,
and may offer an attractive alternative to
monoplotting, also for non-photogrammetrists.
In this paper, we will discuss the advantages and
disadvantages with respect to accuracy,
interpretability and time-efficiency of digital
‘onoplotting in a PC environment, compared with
low-cost analytical stereoplotting for updating
and/or upgrading an existing database.
DATABASE REVISION BY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC MEANS
Aerial photographs, are one of the important
sources of up-to-date geoinformation for digital
map and database updating and/or upgrading.
Photogrammetric techniques are used to extract,
process and integrate in to existing databases the
information from photos.
revision, stereoplotting,
Analytical plotter, Accuracy,
Stereoplotting method
Stereoplotting is manual digitization of features
in a well-oriented stereomodel formed by two
overlapping photographs. It is commonly used to
extract accurate spatial geoinformation in 3-D.
The method requires dedicated equipment,
preferably analytical plotters, and experienced
operators.
Digital photogrammetric workstations, also
referred to as "soft copy systems", offer the same
possibilities as analytical plotters, but without
dedicated hardware except for the stereoviewing
provisions. Although providing image enhancement
tools and superimposition, image interpretation
and feature extraction still have to rely largely
on "manual" operations.
The operators should be able to interpret, perform
the necessary orientations, i.e.,image-to-model
and model-to-map (or ground) transformation and
digitization of the required information, and also
edit and condition the collected information for
integration in the database.
A variety of plotters have been produced in the
past. Nowadays, photogrammetric manufacturers are
producing only analytical plotters, but, because
of their durability, analogue stereoplotters with
microcomputer support are still much in use.
Analytical ‘plotters increase accuracy and
production rates. They are ergonomically designed
and equipped with highly interactive software that
makes operation more convenient, thus decreasing
the time needed for operator familiarization.
Presently introduced low-cost analytical
stereoplotters supported by microcomputers further
reduce equipment costs.
Changes can be mapped inexpensively using a
transparent overlay of the photo indicating the
areas of change (prepared before digitizing) which
is then positioned with the photo in the
instrument. More . sophisticated but rather
expensive superimposition techniques can also be
used. The digital data from the database to be
revised are mapped to the image space, and one or
two synthetic images (mono or stereo
superimposition) are injected in the optical
stream of the instrument and viewed with the
stereomodel. This technique also provides on-line
quality control of the data, but is not yet
implemented on the low-cost range of analytical
plotters.
Digital Monoplotting Method
Digital monoplotting is a feature extraction
method that used two-dimensional digitization of
single photographs supported by relief information
in the form of digital terrain models (DTM).
Monoplotting was developed as a simple,
inexpensive alternative method for feature
493