Full text: XVIIth ISPRS Congress (Part B5)

A quick description of the algorithm according to the pre- 
ceding formulation is: 
a. the matrices Ni N,, N; Ny, Ny, Ny, and uj, Uj, uy, are 
formed for each photo as it is introduced into the 
adjustment, 
b. the matrices R;, R;, R; and r; T; are computed, and 
c. the contributions (R,-R, R1 RT and r; -R;R 1 rj of 
the i th photograph is added to the system of normal 
equation. 
Then the solution of the normals (in the case of minimum 
constraints (15)) is given as 
x=(R+HTH)_r+ETSz (17) 
where S - (H ET - H ET)-! and E, E are arbitrary full rank 
matrices with rank equal to that of the matrices H and H 
respectively, so as to fulfil the relations À ET - 0 and 
A ET-0.A typical choice of E, E is that of inner con- 
straints (see Dermanis, 1991 for analytical representa- 
tions). 
The corrections X; as well as the values of the additional 
parameters y; are computed for each photo separately 
through the relations 
X,- Ri (d-R|3) (18) 
y2Nym,-NIx-NIE) . (19) 
After the computation of the vectors x; and Yi for each 
^ > " 
photo, the vector v; of the estimates for the observation 
errors can be evaluated as 
V; b; - ÀÁ; x - A; X; Di yi (20) 
and the quadratic form is, 
^ T 
Qi- Vj P; v; (21) 
and for all photographs 
Ms 
P=, &i= Vi PiVi . (22) 
ç 
Il 
- 
A 
The a-posteriori variance of unit weight is given by 
^ m 
vss UA (23) 
e 
= 
where DF are the degrees of freedom, which can be 
calculated as 
   
    
  
   
   
   
  
  
    
  
   
  
   
  
   
  
   
    
  
   
  
   
   
  
   
      
  
  
   
   
   
    
   
   
     
     
m m m 
oren-ee = Zn (nt Zt Zeilen (24) 
i=1 il el 
where n is the number of observations in all photos, r is 
the sum of r; (total number of coordinates of control 
points), r? (total number of e.o. parameters), rs (total 
number of additional parameters) and k (number of con- 
straints for the definition of the reference frame). 
Consequently, the covariance matrices are computed ac- 
cording to 
^ ° A 9 A ° ° e e 
C(x)= 62 À = 02 { (R+HTH)-HETS STE} (25) 
fori=1,2 ..m 
C(&,X) = Q;=—-02 { QR; - ETS STE} 
CG)- 9 0,20 (Rr H7 RT Q RR; -ELSS E] 
C$) = -62 Q5, 2-9 Q Ny, Ny! 
C) - 02 Q5, - E RLRT QN, Ny Q6) 
Ch) = € Q5, 2 (Ny! - NI NS, 0 N Ny] 
and 
Ch) = 0 Qs 
where 
Q Q; Qs, 
Qu- P;- [à;x;n,]| 97 Q: 05, || 4 |. 0» 
oT oT p? 
05, 05, 05, 
2.4 Inclusion of geometrical constraints into the 
adjustment 
Theoretically such geometrical constraints can be imposed 
either on x or on X. Practically, however, constraints on 
exterior orientation means that we know the values of 
these parameters quite accurately, which only rarely (if 
ever) is the case. On the other hand, geometrical con- 
straints on ground coordinates of points (eg. parallelism, 
perpendicularity, coplanarity, points on arc, etc.) is very 
usual. Such constraints can then be used to improve our 
solution (eg. Ethrog, 1984). Hence, 
Gx=d (28) 
Then the solution is given by 
x©®=x-QGT(G Q 6") (Gx-d) 
0929 [0-0c'(G0c cQ)
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.