ü
a N 1485 7 %
\ | ^A
= /
2&3 7&
»- = NV 3s
beam-line
chair
Fig. 4 Vertical section along beam line.
Of the eight cameras, only three, on adjacent
stations, will be used at any one time. This
arrangement provides acceptable geometry and target
visibility, as well as redundancies for system
reliability. More than three simultaneously active
cameras would demand additional frame-grabbing
capabilities and complicate operator procedures
unnecessarily.
CONTROL FRAME
The CCD cameras need to be regularly calibrated in
the beam coordinate system using control targets of
known position. For this purpose a total of twelve to
fourteen control points, visible on each image, was
considered suitable. This number of points in an
appropriate configuration is sufficient to obtain the
required precision and reliability. To guarantee a
minimum of twelve visible points per camera station,
a total of 40 suitably placed points had to be
mounted on a removable, but stable frame of cube-
shape.
Permanent mounts are incorporated into the treatment
room floor so that, for each calibration procedure,
the frame can be placed in an identical position with
its centre approximately at the lesion point.
The targets were coordinated to sub-millimetre
precision using theodolite observations and bundle
adjustment algorithms (Brown, 1985).
TARGET DETECTION AND CENTRE DETERMINATION
To enable automatic target detection it was necessary
to introduce point markers which are readily
distinguishable from the background in the controlled
environment of the treatment room. Retroreflective
tape, the use of which is widely reported in the
literature (Brown 1982, Fraser 1988), proved
appropriate for this application. This material
requires suitable lighting originating from the
direction of each camera, best achieved by a
ringshaped light source around the camera lens.
The target detection algorithm developed for the
system relies on binary images, necessitating a
thresholding procedure to separate targets and
background. A computer-aided routine allows the
operator to choose a suitable threshold value by
inspection of the output images, resulting in a
binary image in which targets are represented by bit
value one (white) and the background by value zero
(black). This binary image is then easily searched
for targets and the target boundaries are determined
for centre determination on the original grey images.
After detailed investigation of target centre
determination algorithms (Rubinstein and Riither,
1991) the weighted centre of gravity model in
conjunction with background-reduced circular targets
emerged as the most efficient method for automatic
centre determination. For the system, circular
targets of approximately eight millimetres in
diameter, equivalent to about seven by six pixels on
the image given the geometric parameters, proved
ideal as control point markers.
THE DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRIC PROCEDURE
The photogrammetric procedure can be divided into
four stages:
1 Camera calibration - the position as
well as the interior and exterior
orientation of each camera is found
using the control points.
2 System check - the camera calibrations
and the chair position are checked.
3 Patient positioning - the patient is
moved into the beam-line.
4 Patient monitoring - possible patient
movements are monitored to ensure that
correct alignment is maintained.
C Pre-treatment Stage )
|
Automated camera
callibration and chair
initialisation
Lesion is located relative
to targets in CT or MRI |
scans
Cameras and chair are
checked relatively
|
C Patient Positioning Stage E
Patient is seated in chair
and approximately moved
into treatment position
Image capture and
location, coordination
and identification
of reference targets
Transformation of lesion
and entry point scan
coordinates into beam
coordinates
A |
Calculation of necessary
movements to position
patient into beam
Patient automatically
—] moved into beam and
position checked
|
C Patient Monitoring Stage E
|
Beam activated and
automatic monitoring of
target begins. Automatic
or manual beam cut-off
Fig.5 Flowchart of positioning stages.
Figure 5 depicts a flow chart of these
photogrammetric stages including the lesion location
stage, which is carried out separately as described
above. This diagram emphasises the patient
positioning stage of the project.