on
ch
f
LO
n
on
/,
it
1e
LS
n
le
"ION
Stages 1 and 2 : Expression of the problem
The first two stages look at what makes the
situation a problem and the basic facts associated
with this problem situation. Checkland (1981,
p.264) suggests that a test for adequacy of work to
this point is the ability to give convincing
answers to the following questions: "What resources
are deployed in what operational processes under
what planning procedures with what structures, in
what environments and wider systems, by whom", and
"How is this resource deployment monitored and
controlled"?
Stage 1 is the development of the discussion of the
background of the problem, which leads to, in this,
case, the problem situation of the technology
transfer of remote sensing in Australia. Stage 2
expresses the problem situation in the form of the
"Rich Picture" (Figure 2) which aims to show the
elements of slow-to-change structure and elements
of constantly-changing process within the situation
being investigated.
Stage 3 : Selection
In this stage a choice is made of relevant systems
that the analyst believes will produce insight into
the problem situation. The chosen systems are
expressed in statements as the Root Definitions,
which incorporate the points of view that make the
activities and performance of the systems
meaningful. The initial Root Definition for this
study of technology transfer has been formulated as
follows:
An industry driven system operating within
research centres with the objective of
transferring untransferred technology by:
knowing about untransferred technology,
knowing about targeted industries, selecting
technology to be transferred, selecting means
of transferring technology, applying those
means to an industry, stimulating the ongoing
transfer, and monitoring the success of such
transfers; in order to benefit all involved
parties, in an environment of research,
industrial competitiveness, and national and
international economic development.
The formulation of "good" root definitions is
decisive to the creation of the conceptual model in
Stage 4. Therefore, the Root Definition should be
tested against a set of elements, that if achieved,
indicates that it is well formulated. However, this
does not necessarily tell if it is a "good" Root
Definition. This set of elements is known by the
mnemonic CATWOE, that defines a check-list for
Customer, Actors, Transformation process,
Weltanschauung (worldview), Owner, and Environment.
Invoking the CATWOE for this study results in:
C Industry which can benefit from Technology
Transfer.
A Researcher who wishes to promote a
technology.
T Untransferred technology becomes transferred
technology.
W Transfer of technology is desirable.
0 Industry (that has the power to accept or
reject a transferred technology).
E Research / Industrial Competitiveness /
National and International Economies.
This breakdown appears to be satisfactory for the
problems associated with technology transfer. Major
Stakeholders are identified and the Transformation,
Environment and Weltanschauung all reflect the
essence of the problem.
Stage 4 : Model Building - Conceptual Model
This stage is where a logical expansion of the Root
Definition is made into the minimum necessary set
of activities to define what the system actually
does at a particular resolution level. The
Conceptual Model that results should have only a
limited number of entities, Wilson (1984)
recommends that:
The first resolution level model from a root
definition should not contain more than about
12 activities, otherwise it becomes difficult
to defend them as constituting a minimum
necessary set. It is frequently stated that
the mind is only capable of retaining between
five and nine entities at any one time, and
hence a single stage model expansion should
only be of this order (p.72).
The qualitative modelling process uses pictures and
diagrams to define and communicate structure,
logic, ideas and relationships. The Conceptual
Model should be expressed by verbs.
The logical expansion of the Root Definition for
technology transfer results in a Primary Conceptual
Model of four activities within a technology
transfer system boundary. The linkages illustrate
logical dependency and relationships between
activities, the external environment, and wider
systems. This Primary Conceptual Model is
illustrated in Figure 3.
EXPERTS, INDUSTRY, FUNDING BODIES
RESEARCH
Develop ry
knowledge about
technology transfer,
industry and research
Determine the appropriate
criteria and techniques
to be applied
Monitor and control
the technology
transfer process
Develop, maintain and
apply the technology
transfer process
TRANSFERRED TECHNOLOGY
Figure 3: Primary Conceptual Model - Technology
Transfer Second Resolution Conceptual
Models
The second resolution model takes each activity
from the Primary Conceptual Model and expands that
activity into a more detailed model of activities
within a new sub-system.
Three systems, "knowledge", "criteria" and
"application" have been modelled, with the activity
"monitor and control" remaining at the first level
of resolution (Figure 4).
This detailed model represents a human activity
173