Other 
cified 
efined 
icular 
| real 
ansfer 
ds of 
ficacy 
for 
0 the 
first 
alt in 
about 
en be 
tative 
~ have 
remote 
, and 
will 
ent a 
| then 
| that 
ssment 
jative 
-udied 
lysis 
their 
riews, 
ntial 
‘ases, 
ation 
iseful 
with 
n the 
er, a 
and a 
ation 
'emote 
(SSM) 
'emote 
lysis 
n its 
ncies 
m the 
ing a 
es as 
rm of 
emote 
The iterative nature of the analysis allows 
opportunities to identify weaknesses in the 
existing system early in the study and therefore 
respond both through more detailed modelling and 
action in the real world. An example is the 
activity "monitor and control the technology 
transfer process". The real world comparison 
identifies that it is very desirable, but rarely 
undertaken. Moreover, examination of this activity 
has identified that economic evaluation of 
successful remote sensing projects is an element 
that to date has consistently been lacking. This 
clearly identifies an action that can be taken 
immediately to improve the problem situation. A 
model for the economic evaluation and management of 
remote sensing operations has therefore been 
developed (Finegan, Ellis and Rollings, 1992) and 
is now being tested. 
The cyclic and adaptive nature of the SSM 
facilitates learning and input from other relevant 
systems models (Stage 4b in Figure 1). Therefore 
comparative analysis with existing general models 
for technology transfer allows the SSM model to be 
both validated and further enhanced. This will 
ensure that the resultant model for technology 
transfer is both robust and functional. 
The final model will be presented in a format that 
is accessible to potential users. Options for 
presentation include: 
. Technology template, where the user matches 
the attributes of a particular technology 
with the relevant part of the template, which 
then recommends actions to improve the 
situation. 
Decision tree, where, based on the operation 
of rules, the user traverses the tree to a 
set of recommended actions. This mode lends 
itself to implementation on a rules based 
expert system for remote sensing technology 
management (Finegan 1992). 
CONCLUSION 
The Soft Systems Methodology described in this 
study is successfully providing action to improve 
the situation for the users of remote sensing, 
while developing a model for technology transfer 
that will be both useful and accessible to the 
wider Australian community. 
REFERENCES AND SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY 
Australian Space Office, 1989. Australian Remote 
Sensing Industry Strategy and Action Plan. Sensing 
Opportunities for Australia. Department of 
Industry, Technology and Commerce, Canberra. 
Australian Space Office, 1992. Observing Australia. 
The role of Remote Sensing in a balanced national 
space program. Department of Industry, Technology 
and Commerce, Canberra. 
Boyle, K.A., 1986. Technology Transfer between 
Universities and UK Offshore Industry, IEEE 
Transactions of Engineering Management, EM-33 (1): 
33-42. 
Brimicombe, A.J., 1989. Commercialisation: A south- 
east Asian viewpoint. International Journal of 
Remote Sensing. 10 (2): 429-430. 
Bureau of Industry Economics, 1990. Research Report 
32: Commercial opportunities from public sector 
research. Australian Government Publishing Service, 
"Canberra. 
Checkland, P.B., 1981. Systems Thinking, Systems 
Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. 
Dorsey, H.B and Aucoin, M., 1987. Technology 
Commercialisation from a state agency perspective: 
Technology Business Development - a division of the 
Texas Engineering Experiment Station, Proceedings 
1987 Fall Joint Computer Conference - Exploring 
Technology: Today and Tomorrow. Dallas, TX, USA, 
25-29 Oct 1987, pp. 700-5. 
Ferns, D.C., & Hieronimus, A.M., 1989. Trend 
analysis for the commercial future of remote 
sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 
10 (2), pp. 333-350. 
Finegan, A.D., & Ellis, G., 1991. Towards a clever 
country: The application of systems theory to the 
commercialisation of remote sensing. Proceedings 
1st Australian Photogrammetric Conference. Sydney, 
7-9 November 1991, 10 pages. 
Finegan, A.D., 1991. Lack of co-ordination may 
sabotage plans. The Australian: Computers and High 
Technology Supplement. 10 December 1991, p. 34. 
Finegan, A.D., Ellis, G., & Rollings, N., 1992. A 
model for the economic evaluation and management of 
remote sensing operations. ISPRS Commission VI, 
Washington, USA. 2-14 August, 1992. 6 pages. 
Finegan, A.D., 1992. A methodology to design an 
expert system for remote sensing technology 
management. ISPRS Commission VII, Washington, USA. 
2-14 August, 1992. 5 pages. 
Forster, B.C., 1990. Remote sensing technology 
transfer - problems and solutions. Proceedings 23rd 
International Symposium on Remote Sensing of 
Environment. Bangkok, April 1990 (ERIM, 1990), 1, 
pp. 209-217. 
Nazim Ali, S., 1989. Science and technology 
information transfer in developing countries: some 
problems and suggestions, Journal of Information 
Science, 15, pp. 81-93. 
Prager, D.J. and Omenn, G.S., 1980. Research, 
Innovation and University-Industry Linkages, 
Science, 207, pp. 379-84. 
Specter, C., 1989. Obstacles to remote sensing 
commercialisation in the developing world. 
International Journal of Remote Sensing. 10 (2): 
359-372. 
Szgenda, S.A. and Wilson, M., 1987. Technology 
transfer: commercializing university research, 
Proceedings 1987 Fall Joint Computer Conference - 
Exploring Technology: Today and Tomorrow., Dallas, 
TX, USA, 25-29 Oct 1987, pp. 696-9. 
Wilson, B., 1984. Systems: Concepts, Methodologies, 
and Applications, Brisbane, John Wiley & Sons. 
175