acter,
ler as
tives.
been
itives
h as
MTF,
ctical
S has
tistic
used
ion is
what
n, in
tical
ation
eyes,
ntists
tness
the
1ge.
® The capability to distinguish the fine
contrast depends upon not only the
brightness difference, also the background
‘brightness.
2.2 Visual threshold of contrast
The image visual threshold of contrast is defined
as the density difference which is large enough
for human to observe. It changes with the
density variation, and reaches minimum at a
suitable density value, apart from which it will
grow larger with the decrease or increase of
density.
2.3 An experiment on vision response to
density variation
2.3.1 Experiment
By using different sensitivity negatives, thirty
wedges have been made under different
conditions of exposure and development. And
twenty people with good eyesight and
experience in photogrammetry took part in the
experiment.
Firstly, each density level has been measured
with densimeter for each wedge. Then the limit
levels of high and low densities, which all tested
people could just distinguish. were put down in
writing. Finally, six hundred groups of data have
been obtained. From the statistic results, we
draw some conclusions of vision response to
density variation.
2.3.2 Conclusions
€ The minimal and maximal densities, which
people can just recognize are 0.11 and 2.47
respectively. They fall into the toe and
shoulder of characteristic curves. This result
shows that the density range which people
can adapt to overpasses the linear part of
the curve.
® The maximal distinguishable density at the
low limit of density is 0.19, and the minimal
one at the high limit of density is 2.12. That
111
means that, in order to recognize the details
of object, the minimal density should be
about 0.20 at lower limit, and the maximal
one should be about 2.10 at upper limit.
®The maximal distinguishable contrast
threshold at the lower limit of density is
0.07, and at the upper limit of density is
0.15. That indicates that the lowest contrast
needed when to recognize the higher
density image is twice that of the lower
density image. Even though the toe and
shoulder of the curve should have the image
compressed, the object in the toe is better
distinguished than the object in the shoulder.
Moreover, the difference between the
minimal density and the fog density for
negatives should be two times or three
times as large as 0.07 in order to recognize
the details in shadow.
@In the middle range of density, the visual
contrast threshold is less than 0.02.
Therefore, much information can be
obtained in the middle range of density.
3 Density and Microcharacter
The image microcharacter is used to describe
the reproducibility of the fine image. It
dominates the measurement and interpretation
accuracy of aerial negatives or their copies.
When seen with eyes, the microcharacter
behaves as sharpness and grainness. The
microcharacter indices, such as granularity,
acutance, MTF and information capacity, are no
doubt related to density. In fact, they are the
function — of = density. Therefore, the
microcharacter of image becomes a critical
aspect of density index evaluation.
With the help of PDS data collection system, we
have calculated the resolution. acutance. RMS
granularity, MTF, information capacity of aerial
negatives, which are acquired by the same
camera chain and developed under the same
conditions (see Tab. 1) . The results show as
follows :
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B1. Vienna 1996