3.2. Influence of ground resolution
A few test series with different ground resolutions of the
optoelectronic system were carried out. There are two
ways to realize it. The first one is to change the flight
height, the second one is a change of the field of view with
a constant number of pixels per line. Both ways yield the
same results.
It could be established that the influence of the camera's
ground resolution is not as drastic as the influence of the
area's elevation dynamic.
Consequently it would be better to reduce the data rate of
a camera by using macro pixels and not by using a greater
compression factor. The blocking effects caused by certain
compression algorithms make it harder for the match algo-
rithm to find conjugated points, so the number of matched
points decreases. The elevation error caused by the lower
number of matched points could be much greater than the
error caused by a smaller ground resolution of a camera.
In general the results of the previous chapter could be
established.
3.3. Other aspects
Another point to plead for a small stereo angle is that the
stereo processing just can be started, when all lines got
information about the same area. Consequently the
greater the stereo angle the bigger the memory storing the
image and position data.
In contrast to the simulation we have to take into consider-
ation a bi-directional reflectance in reality. The smaller the
stereo angle the smaller the differences of images caused
by this effect.
Maybe a more intelligent and more expensive match algo-
rithm is able to match a sufficient number of points even if
the stereo angle is large. But actually there is no need for a
great stereo angle, because the accuracy to determine a
single point's elevation will not be improved.
4. CONCLUSION
The main results are: An optimal stereo angle exists and
should be between 10 and 40 degrees. The permissible
range depends on the elevation dynamics of the observed
surface and on the camera's ground resolution. A stereo
angle between 15 and 20 degrees leads to a sufficient
number of matching points and to a good accuracy of the
elevation values under all conditions.
These results underline the importance of a suitable simu-
lation technique for the design and optimization of camera
parameters and observation conditions.
5. REFERENCES
Bórner, A., 1995. Optimierung optoelektronischer Sys-
teme; Diplomarbeit, Technische Universität Ilmenau
Heipke, C., 1994. Digitale photogrammetrische Arbeitssta-
tionen - Algorithmen, Design und Bewertung; Habilitations-
schrift, Technische Universität München
Reulke, N., 1995. Simulation und Optimierung optoelektro-
nischer Systeme am Beispiel der Bestimmung von
30
Wolkengeschwindigkeit und -höhe; Dissertation, Tech-
nische Universität Berlin
Reulke, R., Reulke, N., Jahn, H., 1994. Numerical simula-
tion system for the generation of image data from space-
borne imaging sensors for planetary exploration; SPIE Vol.
2318, pp. 144-154
U.S. Geological Survey, 1992. Mission to Mars: Digital
Topographic Map, Volume 7: Global Topography
WAOSS, 1991a. Wide Angle Optoelectronic Stereo Scan-
ner (WAOSS), Mars-94 Mission, Phase B Study, WAOSS
Science Objectives; Berlin
WAOSS, 1991b. Wide Angle Optoelectronic Stereo Scan-
ner (WAOSS), Mars-94 Mission, Phase B Study, WAOSS
Technical Part; Berlin
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B1. Vienna 1996
Abstı
GPS |
Statio
frame
Progr
numb
The |
opera
such
kinen
execu
navig
Those
pecul
proce
satell
Here
exper
1. Int
The »
NAV
low s
in sig
The :
condi
data
throu
proce