Full text: XVIIIth Congress (Part B2)

edge 
hing 
ision 
men- 
ional 
sing, 
stem. 
ence 
ata", 
ligital 
netry 
übler, 
roject 
Work. 
Jress, 
n Still 
sung, 
point 
t No. 
ETH 
semi- 
metric 
ce on 
5, 9t 
o 3D- 
rift für 
, 193- 
(try for 
jects. 
emote 
D: 
on by 
ited to 
|, 9-19 
ctronic 
21(4), 
anding 
Digital 
eipke), 
ectural 
action. 
onsing, 
ophoto 
on the 
tations, 
THE EPOS SPECKLE FILTER: A COMPARISON WITH SOME WELL-KNOWN SPECKLE REDUCTION 
TECHNIQUES 
Wilhelm Hagg, Manfred Sties 
Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 
Karlsruhe University 
Germany 
Email: {hagg,sties}@ipf.bau-verm.uni-karlsruhe.de 
Commission Il, Working Group 4 
KEY WORDS: Remote Sensing, Radar, SAR, Speckle, Multiplicative Noise, Edge Preserving Filters, Comparison 
ABSTRACT 
Any classification process using SAR images presupposes the reduction of multiplicative speckle noise, since the variations 
caused by speckle does not allow a distinction between neighboring classes within the feature space. This may be done by 
smoothing the images with digital filter algorithms, which removes the high frequent noise but also causes distortions at the 
high frequent image contents, i.e. sharp edges. Several adaptive filter algorithms have been developed, which aim at the 
preservation of edges and single scattering peaks, while homogeneous areas are smoothed as much as possible. This task is 
rendered more difficult by the multiplicative nature of the speckle noise: the signal variation depends on the signal itself. The 
recently developed EPOS speckle filter is compared with other well-known algorithms in this paper. In order to enable an 
objective comparison, the smoothing capability of all filters is adjusted to a similar value. To achieve a measurement for the 
quality, speckle is added synthetically to an image, so it is possible to calculate the RMS-error for each filtering method. Since 
the RMS differ according to the image contents, typical areas for several geometric objects are used to calculate the RMS. 
Also different signal to noise ratios are take into account in the comparison procedure to achieve an exhausting overview of 
the algorithm performance. 
1 INTRODUCTION solve for an operational SAR image interpretation. 
The availability of optical remote sensing data for landuse = Two categories of speckle reduction techniques are distin- 
applications is limited by the local weather conditions, espe- ^ guishable; (1) the averaging of several looks of the same 
cially by clouds. In addition illumination effects due to differ- ^ scene (multi-look processing), and (2) the smoothing of the 
ent sunsets aggravate the interpretation of optical datasets. ~~ image using digital image processing techniques. The multi- 
Therefore “Synthetic Aperture Radar” (SAR) systems were look processing is limited by the geometric resolution of the 
developed which use their own, well defined, microwave il- SAR instrument and the required resolution of the final im- 
lumination to penetrate clouds in the atmosphere. Another age. For the geocoded standard ERS-1 products three inde- 
reason to develop SAR systems is the total different backscat- ^ pendent looks are averaged to achieve a final resolution of 
ter behavior of microwaves due to the long wavelength of ^ about 25 meters. Both techniques use the fact, that averag- 
microwaves relative to optical systems. There is a lot of ing of several independent samples of a measurement reduces 
operational SAR systems on satellite platforms available as the variance of a signal. In the first case, several images are 
the European ERS-1 and ERS-2, the Japanese JERS-1 and averaged, while in the second case values of neighboring pix- 
the Canadian RADARSAT. In addition several experimental els are averaged. The most simple way of smoothing images 
systems were developed for a flight on board of a space shut- ^ with digital image processing techniques is to apply a mean 
tle. Recently the X-SAR/SIR-C mission resulted in the first filter within a moving window around each image pixel. The 
spaceborn multi-frequency images of the earth surface; the result will be a smoothed image with reduced speckle vari- 
instruments operate in the L- C- and X-Band. Also there ex- ation, but edges and single point scatterers, as they appear 
ists a lot of airborne SAR-systems for experimental purposes. in urban areas, are smoothed as well. Adaptive filter algo- 
rithms have been developed which aim at the preservation of 
edges and single scattering peaks, while homogeneous areas 
are smoothed as much as possible. For that purpose the fil- 
tering function has to be adapted to the local image contents 
to reduce the geometric distortions. It is obvious that the 
correction of a grey value, using the pixel values in the neigh- 
borhood, is efficient only in those cases where the neighboring 
pixels represents the same object on the ground. 
While the SAR-systems and SAR-processors are in an oper- 
ational state, the interpretation of SAR images is still under 
development due to several problems such as speckle noise 
and illumination effects in undulated terrain. SAR-processors 
are necessary to reconstruct the image from the synthetic 
aperture by coherently processing the returns from successive 
radar pulses along the flight path, and therefore they may 
be interpreted as the software component of the SAR instru- 
ment. Speckle noise is a system made consequence of the Most filter algorithms for speckle filtering are not fully sat- 
coherent radar illumination and appears as a granular pattern isfactory for the purpose of SAR image classification, since 
in the image. One of the most important feature of speckle the decrease of speckle caused variance is not sufficient for 
noise is its multiplicative character which links the amount of a distinction of neighboring classes within the feature space. 
noise to the signal intensity. The strong distortions of SAR Thus we developed a filter called EPOS (Edge Preserving Op- 
images by speckle noise often prevent an useful application of  timized Speckle-filter) which is published in (Hagg and Sties, 
SAR images in remote sensing. Thus, an effective reduction 1994). The idea for the new algorithm was to adapt an area 
of speckle noise is one of the most important problems to geometry to the image contents in such a kind, that the as- 
135 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B2. Vienna 1996 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.