EXTRACTING SPATIAL INFORMATION FROM DIGITAL
VIDEO IMAGES USING MULTIPLE STEREO FRAMES
Martin Braess, Geodátisches Institut der RWTH Aachen
Commission 11/5
KEY WORDS: Acquisition, Automation, Stereoscopic, Three-dimensional, Close_Range, Scene Reconstruc-
tion, Feature Based Matching.
ABSTRACT:
This paper describes a feature-based approach for the reconstruction of 3D scene geometry. Digital images
are taken from a moving surveying vehicle. Straight lines are matched. We minimize a cost function that
incorporates feature attributes and relations between features using a branch-and-bound algorithm. An example
for the line matching in a short sequence with two image pairs is presented.
1 Introduction
1.1 Problem Description
A surveying vehicle that collects various data for GIS
databases is given. The vehicle is equipped with a
GPS receiver and wheel sensors to determine its abso-
lute position. The wheel sensors furnish 2500 impulses
per turn which are registered with a hardware coun-
ter. The counter values and GPS data are recorded
once per second.
In addition, the vehicle contains a digital video ca-
mera pair. We use two PULNiX TM 9700 cameras.
They synchronously capture grey scale images with
standard video resolution on a PC. The cameras are
mounted on a stable aluminium profile, thus their re-
lative orientation remains constant. Whenever an ob-
ject of interest appears, an operator records one or
more stereo pairs on a fixed disk. The counter values
are stored with every image pair.
The images have to be evaluated in postprocessing
by an operator who is mainly interested in the position
of distinct points and lines in 3D-space. Most objects
of interest in the traffic environment are man-made
and contain straight lines. The object reconstruction
is possible if the correspondence problem is solved. In
this paper we want to support the operator by sug-
gesting correctly matched objects or features.
If a feature is captured in two images, its position
can be determined. In our approach, however, an ob-
ject is followed in the image sequence in order to get
both a higher accuracy and a higher reliability of the
object position. Here, we confine ourselves to the use
of interest points and straight lines only to describe
objects in space.
The outline of this paper is as follows: first, the ca-
mera calibration and feature extraction is briefly de-
scribed. The matching process consists of three sta-
26
ges: initial line matching, orientation of the camera
pair and final matching. The paper is concluded with
a practical example and a short discussion.
1.2 Algorithm Outline
The matching problem is often described as depending
on three items:
e feature attributes
e relations between features
e geometric constraints
Feature attributes are used to determine the similarity
of features to be matched. Typical attributes are grey
values, line parameters or operator values.
Relations between features, however, tell us whether
a match is consistent or not: if two features in one
image have a certain relation, the corresponding fea-
tures in another image are likely to have the same
relation. Typical relations are angles and distances
between features. In some applications the assign-
ment is based on relations only, this is the case of
structural matching [8]. In principle, ternary or even
higher order relations can be used but in this paper
it is assumed that binary relations provide a sufficient
describtion [2].
When the camera orientation is known, this infor-
mation can be introduced in form of geometric con-
straints. In our case, the relative orientation of the
camera pair is known. Then we can impose the co-
planarity constraint for points using two images: two
points can only be matched if they are coplanar.
Lines in space are completely described with 4 pa-
rameters, lines in the image are described with 2 pa-
rameters [7]. That is why any two lines in two images
furnish exactly one line in space, there is no redun-
dancy (the degenerated case where the 3D-line lies
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B2. Vienna 1996
in th
ted
'The
the 1
Th
cisiol
in ge
form
purp
mini
Th
tiona
check
Ther
consi
proc
2
Befoi
pair
test 1
red.
toma
Ther
tion
use t
tions
6 pai
and .
deled
the r
is m
linea
dr(
‘Tests
entat
stem
3
The
luati
from
ted 1
point
with
Sti
edge:
then
lengt
Di
point