SCALE DIFFERENCE CONSIDERATIONS IN CONJUGATE FEATURE MATCHING
Anthony Stefanidis
Peggy Agouris
Department of Spatial Information Science and Engineering
and the National Center for Geographic Information Science and Analysis
University of Maine
5711 Boardman Hall, Rm. 348
Orono, ME 04469-5711
Tel: (207) 581 2180, Fax: (207) 581 2206, e-mail: {tony, peggy} @spatial.maine.edu
Commission III, Working Group 2
KEY WORDS: Softcopy, Image Matching, Scale Space
ABSTRACT
This paper addresses the problem of matching features which have been recorded, in two spatially overlapping images at
substantially different scales. This phenomenon may be associated with foreshortening, in which case the scale differences are
feature- and direction-dependent, or simply with the simultaneous processing of images of different scales, in which case the
scale variations are obviously bidirectional and global in nature. We approach this problem by employing principles of scale
space theory, which deals with the formalization and classification of signal contents and trends by examining the behavior of
signals in various resolutions. Coarse resolutions convey only the dominant trends of a signal (corresponding to low-
frequency information), while in finer resolutions information details (high-frequencies) are also included. When matching
features recorded in substantially different scales in digital imagery, we are actually attempting to establish correspondences
among different scale representations of the same object space scene. Typical matching techniques fail or perform poorly in
terms of accuracy in such cases, because they do not consider that beyond geometric, scale differences are also of radiometric
nature. The methodology presented in this paper proceeds by identifying scale differences among conjugate features,
identifying proper image pyramid levels at which matching should be performed, and only then precisely matching conjugate
features. The analysis of the matching results permits the transformation of matching uncertainties through scale space, and
the derivation of realistic accuracy estimates.
1. INTRODUCTION
Matching, the task of identifying similar features in two or
more spatially overlapping images, is a dominant research
issue in digital image analysis, as it is a fundamental
operation, involved in practically all photogrammetric
applications. Despite the great advancements made in digital
image matching, and the numerous algorithms and strategies
developed employing geometric and radiometric similarity
criteria to identify conjugate features, there still exist
problematic cases, where matching fails to produce reliable
results. The lack of sufficient radiometric variations is a
typical example of such a case. These problems are, to a
certain extent, adversely affecting the role of digital image
matching for geoinformation generation, thus delaying the
much anticipated full automation of the mapping process.
Among the cases where matching performs poorly,
producing unreliable or even no results at all, is the case of
features which have been recorded in two spatially
overlapping images at substantially different scales. This
phenomenon can be associated with isolated features within
a pair of images of otherwise similar scales, or with the
processing of images of overall different scales. The first
8
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B3. Vienna 1996
case is rather object-oriented and its occurrence is dependent
on specific image capturing and object shape combinations.
The latter is an issue which is expected to receive much
higher attention in the near future, as it is inherently
associated with three-line sensor imagery (e.g. MOMS)
which is becoming more widely available [Schneider &
Hahn, 1992], while research also moves towards the fusion
of aerial and satellite digital imagery for geoinformation
extraction [Gruen et al., 1995], or the integration of digital
imagery within geographic information systems [Agouris et
al.; 1996], whereby digital imagery of various scales is
combined during the performance of complex digital image
analysis processes.
In this paper we examine the problems occurring when
attempting to match conjugate features whose images differ
in scale. The presented method employs scale space
concepts for the identification and accommodation of scale
differences in matching.
2. SCALE SPACE THEORY
The information content of a signal is encoded in its values
and their variations. These variations occur over a wide
range of spati
major signal t
localized tren
limited areas.
macro- and m
cognitive prc
often intuition
to be algorith
by machine-s
The concept
multiple scale
research in
Tanimoto & |
has been for:
processing co!
the papers of
[Witkin, 19
identification
values of sign
in various res
signal defined
(m+1)-dimens
additional par
Digital imag
functions defi
space is the
representation
Fx, x): com
Uy ss)
resolutions (te
values (s9,5;,
scale space f2
scale space fa
is decompose:
Fig. 1: A.
signal is at
For different
families of
generation is