in
of
or
le
le
le
commission errors (included in a class). Therefore,
the misclassification matrix seems to be a better tool.
Completeness will report on missing features due to
inattention of the operator or obstructed objects. For
photogrammetric control the superimposition
technique is the most reliable. Completeness is
checked based on specifications with additional rules
such a minimum length, minimum width, minimum
area, etc. Features or areas where field
completeness is required can be given a special code
during data collection, facilitating in this way the field
operations. In addition, clear specifications are
required for minimum completeness percentage, as
well as producer and consumer risk.
Logical consistency can only be checked to some
extent with available CAD software. More powerful
systems where data collection takes place within a
GIS environment offer more possibilities for on-line
checking. Temporal accuracy refers to the currency
of data. This type of information may be critical for
certain classes of features, subject to rapid changes
and for applications requiring current data.
2. QUALITY CONTROL AND
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC FEATURE EXTRACTION
Different strategies may be applied to ensure quality
of a final product. The choice is between the final
verification strategy at the end of a production line
and the "zero defect strategy" where all the
processes of a production line are controlled. This is
obviously a better and more economic approach as
it may lead to zero defect production; for this
purpose, a quality system is required. It can be
defined as a "documented organizational structure
consisting of processes, procedures, resources and
techniques with the objective to assure quality in that
organization" (ISO).
2.1 Quality control in a production line
The "zero defect strategy" can be sudivided into three
levels (Eslami, 1995):
Level 1 is called the process control which
continuously monitors the quality of the various
aspects of data production and handling process.
Decision rules need to be developed for each
process based on quality parameters and quality
standards.
Level 2 consists of the data editing process in
which every operation directly affects the quality
of the data.lt is also a critical phase since many
tasks are performed either in semi-automatic or
automatic mode.
Level 3 contains a monitoring system based on an
acceptance sampling technique. Decision rules
are required in order to accept or reject a work lot
of output (e.g. maps)
2.2 Process control procedure
A control procedure starts by extracting values of
relevant quality parameters which give an indication
13
of the integrity of performance in a particular process.
For the orientation process well established accuracy
standards are available for interior, relative and
absolute orientation (e.g. maximum residuals errors
in X, Y and Z). If a computed value is found to be
acceptable, one proceeds to the next process,
otherwise corrective actions need to be initiated
(figure 1).
Back to
From vo process
Extract a Corrective
relevant action
value
Compare with
a pre-defined
tolerance value
Acceptable?
Next process
Figure 1: Process control procedure
A control chart is often used in production lines to
detect deterioration of quality characteristics and to
forestall failures of a process. It is a graphical display
of a quality characteristic that has been measured
and computed from a sample versus the sample
number or time.
As long as the graph is located between lower and
upper control limits, the process is in control. A non-
random pattern in this chart may be taken as an
evidence of assignable cause (e.g. large mean Y-
parallax on a particular instrument).
2.3 Photogrammetric feature extraction:
processes and products
A photogrammetric production line can be subdivided
into 6 to 8 processes, depending on the type of
product to be delivered (e.g. spatial data, DTM,
orthophoto). For each process and the derived
product, a quality control procedure needs to be
developed.
The quality of a product can be described by a
certain number of measurable parameters, whose
values will compared to given standards
(figure 3).
2.4 Quality parameters and standards
In the past, quality control strongly emphasized the
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B4. Vienna 1996