Full text: XVIIIth Congress (Part B4)

  
this method, the most important thing is 
definition of extreme value in the enclosed area. 
An undulation curve was used for extreme value 
estimation in this study. An undulation curve is 
expressed a relationship between radius from top 
of a mountain and the undulation. The undulation 
means difference between minimum elevation and 
maximum elevation. It is represented one of the 
topographical feature. If geological structure is 
homogeneity, the undulation curve becomes almost 
same with neighbor mountains. So, when acreage 
of enclosed area could be calculated, maximum 
elevation can be estimated. 
Finally, a complete DEM can be generated 
from combination of previous two interpolated 
DEMs. This method doesn't need searching profile 
or definition of calculation window size. So, this 
will be more reliable method. Figure 6 shows 
shaded image of generated DEM by this developed 
method using previous contour map. In this figure, 
there are no noisy area. 
4. RESULTS AND EVALUATIONS 
Evaluations of buffering method were 
carried out by comparison with existing methods 
which are profile method and window method. 
Items for evaluation are not only elevation but also 
topographical feature such as slope gradient and 
slope aspect, stream pattern and slope stability. 
Verification data were generated from 5m 
grid DEM by profile method using 1:25000 
topographical maps. The map had enough number 
of contour line to apply any interpolation methods. 
The generated 5m grid DEM were resampled to 50m 
grid size by taking the average in order to make 
more suitable DEM for verification. 100m, 200m, 
300m and 400m interval contour line maps were 
created from the verification DEM. Those contour 
line maps were used for DEM generation by using 
each interpolation method from each contour map. 
4.1 Elevation 
An index of elevation accuracy is used 
percentages of correct pixels on the whole pixels. In 
case of elevation evaluation, correct pixel means 
difference with verification DEM indicates inside 
of 20m. Figure 7 shows relationship between 
contour line interval and correct percentage in each 
method. In this figure, accuracy has tendency to 
drop with increasing contour interval. And 
buffering method is always located the highest 
accuracy in all contour intervals. Though window 
method shows almost same accuracy with 
Correct percentage (96) 
buffering method in 100m contour interval, the 
accuracy becomes about 10% less in other contour 
intervals. Profile method shows the worst results, 
because radiated noises influence to accuracy. 
90.00 m 
   
   
  
— -$- - - Profile 
80.00 | --_y-- Window 
70.00 L —3J»— Buffering 
60.00 FE 
50.00 % 
40.00 EL 
i. 
30.00 } “eg, 
7 
20.00 A L 1 L L i A i 
  
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 
Contour line interval (m) 
Figure 7 Relationship between contour line interval 
and correct percentage of elevation 
42 Slope Gradient 
A slope gradient can be expressed from DEM, 
which is one of the most important items for 
topographical analysis. In this study, the slope 
gradient means maximum inclination at one target 
pixel. An index of slope gradient accuracy is also 
used percentages of correct pixels. In case of slope 
gradient accuracy, correct pixel means difference 
with verification slope gradient data indicates 
inside of 20 degree. Figure 8 shows relationship 
between contour line interval and correct 
percentage in each method. Buffering method is 
always located the highest accuracy in all contour 
intervals. Though profile method shows almost 
same accuracy with buffering method in 100m 
contour interval, the accuracy becomes 10% less in 
other contour intervals. The window method shows 
the worst results, because steep slope along contour 
line influenced to accuracy. 
   
80.00 = ; 
—-$- - - Profile 
70.00 | --Jü-- Window 
60.00 L —f— Buffering 
  
40.00 } Wo . 
= VIDE S25 
- i] 
30.00 } —e 
20.00 L i 1 L A L ri — 
  
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 
Contour line interval (m) 
Figure 8 Relationship between contour line interval 
and correct percentage of slope gradient 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B4. Vienna 1996
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.