Full text: XVIIIth Congress (Part B5)

_ X 
tion 
J with photo- 
2 photographs 
riately located 
fter the data 
e detail points 
e roof surface, 
nces between 
> deformation 
ain factors that 
nethods have 
etwork design 
a multi-station 
established to 
as well as the 
Is X, Y, and Z, 
)% overlap for 
es the camera 
Photographs were taken at each station before and after 
deformation with both cameras from the same stations and 
with the same orientation. Due to the difference in the format 
of the imaging area for the two cameras (i.e. the area of the 
emulsion for the non-metric camera and the CCD frame in 
the digital camera), and the difference in the focal lengths, 
two options were available, namely to keep the camera-to- 
object distance unchanged and get a different photo scale for 
each camera, or else to keep the photo scale constant and 
change the camera-to-object distance. 
From a practical point of view, the first option was chosen. 
The second option was difficult to achieve due to the 
expected short depth of field, which would prevent a clear 
and sharp image of the whole model. The camera-to-object 
distance was chosen to be 2.5 m which resulted in a photo 
scale of 1:90 for the non-metric camera, and 1:315 for the 
digital camera. The deformation was facilitated by changing 
the tension of the standing wires, which in turn affected the 
hanging wires as well. 
5. INSTRUMENTATION 
The non-metric camera used is an Olympus OM10 equipped 
with 28 mm nominal focal length, 36 mm x 24 mm image 
format, f-stop ranges from 2.8 to 22, an automatic exposure 
time adaptor and four artificial fiducial marks which had been 
placed in the photo plane for another project. The recording 
medium was a Kodak Elite 400 diapositive colour film. 
While capturing the images, f/22 was selected as aperture, 
which represents the smallest diaphragm opening of ~1.3 
mm, to maximize the depth of field. The regular illumination of 
the laboratory dictated an exposure time of 1 sec. 
A Fujix DS-100 digital still memory card camera was also 
utilized. It is an off-the-self, low cost digital camera, not 
specifically designed for scientific or photogrammetric 
purposes. It can be considered as a non-metric digital 
camera because it has similar unstable geometric charac- 
teristics as conventional cameras, except for the recording 
medium. 
Its focal length varies between 8 to 24 mm for the Fujinon 3X 
power zoom lens with f-stop ranges from 2 to 11 and 
exposure time settings of 1/4 to 1/750 sec. The picture 
element is a CCD ( Charge-Coupled Devise ) solid state 
image sensor. The camera has a frame of 720 x 488 pixels 
with a pixel size of 8.5 um x 9.7 um. The storing medium is 
a IM-85 Image Memory Card with 8 Mbyte capacity. The 
images stored in the card can be displayed and resampled on 
the computer using the DP-100 Memory Card Processor and 
SD-PC (Digital Stil Camera System Image Handling) 
software. The resampled image has dimensions of 640 x 488 
pixels with a square pixel size of 9.7 uum x 9.7 um. 
For image capturing, the minimum focal length 8 mm was 
chosen to obtain the maximum angular field of view. Again, 
the maximum f-stop=11 along with the maximum exposure 
time ( t=1/4 sec) were chosen. 
In addition to two sets of 6 images each ( hard-copy film and 
digital ), a third set was obtained by scanning ( digitizing ) the 
hard copy images. A Nikon scanner for slides was used for 
this task. The scanning resolution was 59 DPMM ( dots per 
millimetre) and the final resolution for the output image was 
101.7 P/mm ( pixel per millimetre). This final resolution led to 
9.8 um x 9.8 um pixel size. 
The output image was chosen to have a format of 1.325 cm 
x 1.000 cm which produced a frame of 13475 x 10170 pixels. 
Due to the differences in image formats between the hard- 
copy and scanned images, the photo scale for the scanned 
images was calculated to be 1:157.5 with a hypothetical focal 
length of 16 mm. 
6. PHOTO MEASUREMENTS 
Photocoordinates are the fundamental input for the analytical 
photogrammetric adjustment. The accuracy of the final 
results is directly affected by the accuracy of the 
measurement of the photo coordinates. Due to the fact that 
we have two different types of information, analogue images 
and digital images, two different photocoordinate measuring 
instruments were needed. 
For the hard-copy images, the analytical plotter Wild BC2 
was used in monocomparator mode to measure the photo 
coordinates of the 6 photos. Each photo was observed three 
times. The average photo coordinates and their standard 
deviations were calculated. An average standard deviation for 
each photo was also calculated to provide an indicator of the 
observation precision. Table(1) illustrates the precision of the 
observations for both epochs. 
  
  
  
  
    
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
ODE 
  
Table(1) The precision of the observations for hard copy 
images ( in um at photo scale ) 
The photo coordinates of the digital images were measured 
with the Leica DVP ( Digital Video Plotter ) system. Some the 
advantages of DVP are its a very powerful photogrammetric 
software, its low cost compared to any other digital 
photogrammetric workstation, its suitability to be installed in 
any ordinary PC with no need for a high capacity hard drive, 
and its subpixel accuracy in measuring the photo 
coordinates, which compares well with the accuracy of any 
analytical plotter. 
Again, each image, either digitally collected or scanned, was 
measured three times and the average values and standard 
deviations for all photo coordinates were calculated. 
Tables(2) and (3) illustrate the precision obtained in 
measuring the photo coordinates of the digital images in both 
pixels and um. 
149 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B5. Vienna 1996 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.