Full text: XVIIIth Congress (Part B5)

d amount of 
mmetrists and 
the general 
togrammetry. 
| raised in the 
tly raised in 
;ommission V 
ore generally 
meet and 
some of the 
of medical 
lich interested 
eral and the 
e. 
S own special 
1volvement of 
olvement with 
cipline. Live 
their comfort, 
aving to relate 
5 involved in a 
requires that 
nd needs and 
useable form. 
ogrammetry's 
ers from the 
an the internal 
and medicine, 
for external 
chniques have 
applications, 
yr for medical 
tion, deducing 
ding all-round 
g the intricate 
the retina, and 
id can make 
There may be 
ric community. 
nts are carried 
led for unique 
e commercial 
be seen as 
eas in which 
e expected to 
is not always 
interested in 
many useful 
measurement, 
» perhaps with 
is notable that 
iighly valuable 
  
probe positioning system (Adams et al., 1994) is really the 
comparatively simple (if unfamiliar to medical practitioners) 
three-dimensional co-ordinate transformation. Indeed, in a 
survey reply, Osterwalder reported currently using "very 
simple almost primitive tools" including a measuring tape, 
in daily diagnosis and treatment, noting that equipment 
used in future would be more accurate and time saving - 
and not simply more impressive! We must be careful to 
bear in mind the end users' requirements. 
iv) Photogrammetry faces most competition from 
measurement which can be carried out utilising targets 
while photogrammetric methods involving measurements on 
surfaces via a random network of points can more easily be 
undertaken by photogrammetrists, who therefore should 
consider concentrating on measurement involving the 
matching of corresponding points. 
v) Although in many cases of real need in external medical 
measurement, realistic alternatives to photogrammetry have 
not been advanced, photogrammetry does face strong 
competition in certain applications from "non- 
photogrammetric" alternatives, usually optical techniques, 
which deserve some recognition and consideration, and the 
importance of the alternatives should be assessed. 
vi) It must be accepted that medical practitioners are 
bombarded with other technologies, and photogrammetry 
is not always vital. Announcements for the new journal, 
Biomedical Optics, from SPIE, for example, describes the 
scope of the journal does not mention photogrammetry in 
a long list of its topics of coverage. It is argued that 
surface measurement must have qualities which allow it to 
compete with other attractive technologies. 
Communication. The above points do not fully explain 
any failure of photogrammetry to be more widely used. 
Frequently, the discussion on this matter relates to the 
problems caused by the need to communicate with the 
medical profession. It is of course crucial to understand 
exactly what the medical practitioner wants, to understand 
exactly what the requirements and demand are for medical 
measurement. Photogrammetrists pursuing medical 
measurement need to recognise the full requirements of the 
medical practitioner. These requirements may relate to 
accuracy or cost or convenience or other matters. 
Photogrammetrists need also to ensure that the medical 
worker understand clearly the capabilities and limitations to 
photogrammetry. Especially important is the need to 
provide meaningful medical parameters or other information 
which is easily interpretable, and making the effort needed 
to find acceptable means of supplying useable information. 
Poor communication with the medical profession can 
obviously lead to wasted work in which the exact and 
complete requirements of the end-user are not clear. 
ltis also arguable that better communication can pinpoint 
demand and opportunities which are otherwise not 
foreseeable, but which can be uncovered by contact with 
those in another profession. It can lead to missed 
opportunities, such as in real-time monitoring of surgery 
365 
(see Tredwell et al., 1995), or perhaps even in the lucrative 
area of assisting sports training. 
Photogrammetrists need the direct help of the medical 
profession. The Working Group needs not only the 
contact, but also the acceptance of the medical profession. 
There remain some less obvious but useful areas of 
measurement which have not been tackled by 
photogrammetrists, but which deserve to be investigated, 
and which may be discovered by contact with medical 
practitioners. 
Communication should not only be directly with the medical 
profession but also with bio-medical engineers and other 
technologists who are often more closely involved with 
measurement and whose education and 
scientific/engineering background makes communication 
less complicated. 
In some ways, photogrammetrists have made themselves 
remote. Adams (1994, personal communication) warns 
that, "We have the unhappy knack of making our discipline 
sound so complicated and intricate that we scare off our 
customers who then go and re-invent ‘our’ wheel." 
Photogrammetrists need to be clear about their own skills. 
The skill of the photogrammetrist has essentially meant an 
ability to deal with three-dimensions and with precision and 
accuracy. 
Overall, the current communication must be improved. To 
date photogrammetrists have been under-represented at 
relevant bio-medical conferences. Trinder (J.C. Trinder, 
University of New South Wales, personal communication, 
1994) has reported that the meeting on scoliosis in Toronto 
in 1992 "did not include too many photogrammetrists". The 
report on the last International Symposium on Three 
Dimensional Scoliotic Deformities combined with 
International Symposium on Surface Topography and 
Spinal Deformity", held in 1994 in Pescara, Italy, noted that, 
"Attendance appeared to derive largely from the medical 
profession, but with a significant number who could be 
categorised as bio-mechanical engineers or scientists. 
Very few would have classed themselves as 
photogrammetrists", (Mitchell, 1995). 
Whether these outcomes are due to a lack of desire on the 
part of photogrammetrists to attend or whether it is due to 
ignorance of the existence of the meetings is impossible to 
be certain about. However, it seems reasonable to 
conclude that photogrammetrists interested in 
measurement should know of these conferences and 
attend. The Working Group should publicise the existence 
of such meetings. 
However, we must be careful about the meetings. One 
concept that appears to be prevalent is that to hold 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B5. Vienna 1996 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.