CLOSED-FORM SPACE RESECTION USING PHOTO SCALE VARIATION
by
Riadh A. H. Munjy
Mushtaq Hussain
Calgis,
1477 E.
Fresno,
Shaw Ave.,
Inc.
Suite 110
CA 93710
USA
Commission V, Working Group 2
KEY WORDS: Algorithms, Close Range,
Convergent,
Orientation, Transformation.
ABSTRACT
Space resection is
photograph are determined. However,
the process by which the
because the observation equations
approximations of parameters are necessary at the beginning of the adjustment.
spatial location and orientation of a
are non-linear,
A closed
solution means that there is no need for any initial values or estimates of the spatial
position and the orientation of the photograph.
A general solution for closed space
resection is proposed and described. The solution is based on the analysis of the scale
variations of the image distances between the control points. The proposed approach has
been tested in close range photogrammetry project with highly oblique and convergent
photography.
INTRODUCTION
The problem of space resection involves the
determination of the spatial position and
the orientation: of. a. camera | exposure
station. In photogrammetric practice, the
solution of this problem is most commonly
arrived at through a least squares
adjustment based on the collinearity
condition. Since this. is. a nonlinear
model, approximations of the exterior
orientation parameters are necessary in
order to initiate an iterative adjustment
solution. To obviate the need for such
initial estimates for the parameters,
especially in the case of convergent or
oblique photography which is often used in
the case of close range photogrammetric
applications, various efforts have been
made in the past by photogrammetrists and
mathematicians to develop a closed-form
space resection solution. In. addition,
there has been considerable interest in
such a solution in the field of robot
vision since the early days of its
application to the three-dimensional
analysis (Sobel 1974).
Closed-form space resection can be achieved
by using the Direct Linear Transformation
(DLT) as was proposed by Abdel Aziz and
Karara (1971). But a minimum of six object
control points are needed. Other closed-
form solutions introduced special
additional constraints such as the
assumption that the object plane is nearly
parallel to the image plane (Rampal, 1979).
Fischler and Bolles (1981) and Zeng and
Wang (1992) both proposed a somewhat
similar closed-form space resection
solution: that leads to a fourth degree
polynomial in a variable that does not
represent the spatial camera position nor
its orientation. This leads to complexity
of the solution resulting in multiple roots
390
for the which are
imaginary.
polynomial, two of
Our approach for a closed-form resection
solution is based on the well known fact
that the scale in a perspective photograph
is variable across the image plane. One
explanation for this variation is the fact
that during the imaging process in a frame
camera, the third dimension (z image
coordinate) in the image space is being
forced to remain equal to the focal length
of the camera at each image point.
Conversely, a constant scale in the image
space can be enforced, if the camera focal
length is allowed to vary across the photo.
If the scale between a set of observed
image points, such as for some object space
control points, is forced to remain
unchanged, it will cause a move in the
coordinates in the image space. This will
result in a new set of image coordinates
and a different focal length (z image
coordinate) at each control point. The new
set of coordinates may be viewed as a
representation of a scaled and rotated
three dimensional model of the object
control. points... Using. a. closed | three
dimensional transformation between the
ground coordinates and the newly formed
three dimensional coordinates will result
in. the camera Spatial position and
orientation parameters.
The collinearity equation which describes
the geometrical relationship between the
object point, camera spatial position and
its exterior and interior orientation, and
the image coordinates of the point, can be
derived from a three dimensional conformal
transformation. With this derivation the
constant scale in the three dimensional
transformation is eliminated and constant
focal length is imposed to reflect the
camera geometry. The resulting image is a
three dimensional model with constant 7
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B5. Vienna 1996
(focal 1
our PIC
constant
image CO
the poin
its meas
length t«
The pro]
scale is
case of
which is
space re:
By fixin
the chan
due to f
2:and 3
jy
1
The hori
points a
Where i-
The sce
dimensio
as:
$cale
i-1,2 an
where:
DAC
and X,Y,
in a.r
System.
Expandin
variable
fa
d.f.+