Full text: XVIIIth Congress (Part B5)

jrement systems will 
quality control and 
ES 
imetric investigation of 
gr. & Rem. Sensing, 
, 1994. An optical 3D 
lity control in industry. 
: 2249, pp. 192-199. 
ahren zur rotations- 
Bildmessung und 
» Sinnreich, K., 1993. 
PA - a measurement 
1metry. In: Optical 3D 
Isruhe, Germany, pp. 
., 1990. Concept of an 
machine. Int. Arch. 
pp. 816-822. 
K., 1992: Optical 3-D 
control in industry. Int. 
(B5), pp. 56-59. 
1987: Ingenieur- 
eiten. Bund Deutscher 
Heft 4. 
nna 1996 
OBJECT RECOGNITION USING MULTI-SENSOR FUSION AND ACTIVE EXPLORATION 
Claus Brenner and Michael Hahn 
Institute of Photogrammetry 
Stuttgart University 
P.O.B. 106037 
70049 Stuttgart / Germany 
ISPRS Commission V, Working Group | 
KEY WORDS: Active exploration, object recognition, multi-sensor fusion, free-form surfaces 
ABSTRACT 
This paper presents a concept for the recognition and localization of objects which relies on multi-sensor-fusion and active 
exploration. Today research in photogrammetry generally agrees that the use of complementary sensors, e.g. ranging and 
imaging cameras, is important for simplifying interpretation related tasks. But no notice has been taken so far on the role of 
active exploration. Our work is part of a research program where five institutes of Stuttgart University cooperate to develop 
an experimental measuring system for flexible inspection and gauging. The system will be capable of determining auto- 
matically the shape, form and class attributes of an industrial object. It then solves in a self-acting manner the measuring 
task associated with that object. The paper briefly describes the experimental measuring system and the used sensors. It 
then focuses on the object recognition concept. With first results a number of subsequent processing steps of the whole 
procedure is illustrated. 
1 INTRODUCTION 
For years, the production of many plastic and metal parts, 
for example in the automobile industry, has been auto- 
mated. While at the same time the complexity of the parts 
increases, often the production lots get smaller. This has 
led in many areas to a more flexible assembly of the pro- 
ducts. Quality assurance in this case is often performed 
with individually prepared gauges or specialized measur- 
ing systems, which is a very unflexible solution. Addition- 
ally, the need for a 10096 quality control has grown in areas 
such as automobile production, since more and more com- 
plicated parts are assembled by suppliers. 
Optical measurement techniques have several properties 
that make them interesting for flexible gauging and inspec- 
tion tasks: they are able to carry out quickly measurements 
and are applicable to a wide range of materials including 
deformable objects. When used in conjunction with pho- 
togrammetric techniques, optical measurement can yield 
very accurate results. 
Despite those advantages, optical measurement tech- 
niques are not well accepted in the industry (Grün 1994). 
One reason for this is that traditional measurement tech- 
niques, such as coordinate measuring machines (CMM), 
are very well established whilst optical systems with com- 
parable performance have not been commercially available 
until recently. This may change now with new very high 
resolution sensors and projectors. Another drawback is that 
optical techniques are often considered to be too compli- 
cated to be operated under factory conditions. Testing of 
geometric specifications is simply solved by an unskilled 
worker by placing a part on a part-specific gauge. Further, 
59 
optical measurements often give accuracies which depend 
on the specific object. In unfavourable cases, e.g. if an ob- 
ject's surface is soiled, measurement may become impossi- 
ble using fixed sensor and lighting positions. But changing 
this conditions (e.g. by changing the sensor, lighting or ob- 
ject positions) usually requires some skilled person familiar 
with that particular measuring system. 
To overcome these difficulties, two key components of in- 
spection and measurement systems will be 
1. multi-sensor-fusion and 
2. active exploration. 
Multi-sensor fusion gives a system the opportunity to se- 
lect another measurement technique if the measurement 
task can not be performed with the currently used tech- 
nique. Thus, sensor-specific flaws can be avoided. More- 
over, combining sensors with different resolutions allows 
for precise measurements with the accuracy of the fine- 
resolution sensor whilst the field of view is that of the 
coarse-resolution sensor. 
Active exploration is the process of choosing sensors and 
sensor positions automatically when capturing the object 
under consideration. Ideally, this is some hierarchical pro- 
cess, much like humans proceed when they examine some 
object: first an overall view of the object is taken which re- 
veals some general properties and hints on interesting fea- 
tures of this object. Then those features are inspected in 
detail. For a measurement system this means that different 
sensors are used for different levels of detail. Active explo- 
ration also allows to change sensor and lighting positions 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B5. Vienna 1996 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.