Full text: XVIIIth Congress (Part B7)

x, "Sub- 
a linear 
", Inter- 
.993. 
Spanner, 
spectral 
aluation 
te Sens- 
inni, M. 
ion with 
] to the 
C.-T. 
pproach 
Remote 
84. 
--optical 
= Trans. 
985. 
Kowalik, 
nponent 
togram- 
)p.1079- 
imacraft 
data for 
national 
0, 1986. 
the esti- 
national 
59-1177, 
R. Gille- 
ire anal- 
e, vol.1, 
STREAMLINED ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION CHARACTERIZATION USING REMOTE SENSING 
TECHNIQUES: CASE STUDIES FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS 
David M. Carden, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Oak Ridge Operations, USA 
Charles L. Nalezny, U.S. DOE-Headquarters, Office of Environmental Management, USA 
John Smyre, Lockheed Martin Energy Research, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA 
Thomas K. Evers, Lockheed Martin Energy Research, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA 
Amy L. King, Lockheed Martin Energy Research, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA 
Commission VII, Working Group 7 
KEY WORDS: Remote Sensing, Environment, Monitoring, Imagery, Infrared, Multispectral, Thermal 
ABSTRACT 
The paper provides an overview of the DOE Oak Ridge Operations Remote Sensing Program and discusses how data from this Program 
have assisted the Environmental Restoration Program in streamlining site characterization activities. Descriptions have been provided 
for three case studies in which remote sensing imagery has provided a more focused understanding of site problems with a resultant 
reduction in the need for costly and time consuming ground-based sampling approaches. 
1. BACKGROUND 
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Oak Ridge Operations 
Environmental Restoration Program began in 1984. At this time, 
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) corrective 
measures and closures regulations were the principal drivers for 
mitigating contaminant releases from disposal areas that had 
received hazardous and mixed wastes. Since that period, the 
Environmental Restoration Program has dramatically expanded in 
scope and regulatory emphasis scope to include remediation of 
numerous Oak Ridge waste sites and Decontamination and 
Decommissioning (D&D) of hundreds of old DOE buildings and 
structures. 
The cost of collecting and analyzing environmental data to address 
environmental remediation and D&D problems is a major portion 
of the total DOE Oak Ridge annual budget. Until 1992, the 
typical method for site characterization was the use of land-based 
sampling techniques involving manual sample collection and 
analytical lab analysis. Such characterization methods were slow 
and costly, e.g., for one 60-acre waste area at Oak Ridge National 
Laboratory (ORNL), a four-year and $45 million remedial 
investigation was conducted. In the past three years, however, the 
methods for remedial investigation have seen a substantial shift to 
the use of screening-based characterization including remote 
sensing. The reasons for this shift were: (1) DOE and their 
regulators saw that too much time was being spent on studying site 
contamination problems while there was little progress in actual 
cleanup, (2) there has been a dramatic decrease in the funding 
available for conducting environmental restoration activities, and 
(3) regulators and DOE became more willing to accept the higher 
level of uncertainty in screening level data for making many 
preliminary remedial decisions. 
As a result of the increased emphasis on screening level 
characterization methods, the DOE Oak Ridge Operations Remote 
Sensing Program was formally established in 1992. The Program 
was implemented to provide a technical support organization for 
planning and implementation of remote sensing data collection, 
using both conventional and classified methods. The Program is 
funded by the DOE-Headquarters (HQ) Office of Environmental 
Management and is directed by the DOE Oak Ridge Operations 
Office. Implementation support is provided by Lockheed Martin 
91 
Energy Systems. The following case studies describe how the 
support of the Oak Ridge Remote Sensing Program has improved 
the efficiency for three Oak Ridge environmental restoration 
projects. Although many other examples exist, these three cases 
represent a good cross-section of the type of support offered. 
2. CASE STUDY: BURIED TRENCHES AT ORNL 
2.1 Introduction 
Solid Waste Storage Area (SWSA) 4 is located in the DOE ORNL 
complex and covers approximately 23 acres. In the 1950s, 
SWSA-4 received a variety of low- and higher-activity radioactive 
wastes, including transuranic wastes, all of which were buried in 
unlined trenches or augur holes. During the period 1955 through 
1963, SWSA-4 was designated as the Southern Regional Burial 
Ground for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. Approximately 
half of the waste received at SWSA-4 in the 1950s originated at 
ORNL, while the remainder of waste came from a number of 
off-site locations. 
The legacy of waste disposal practices at SWSA-4 resulted in a 
major environmental remediation concern due to shallow 
groundwater contamination from radionuclides with subsequent 
release to site surface streams through a series of seeps. Water 
sampling data in White Oak Creek downstream of SWSA-4, 
indicated that these releases contributed approximately 35-percent 
of the total off-site contribution of radioactive strontium and 20- 
percent of the tritium contribution. Reducing the flow of these 
contaminants would require precisely locating the trenches that 
contributed the highest percentage of contaminants and 
undertaking remedial actions to contain and isolate the buried 
waste from surface and subsurface water. Unfortunately, most of 
the operational records that provided locational information were 
destroyed in a fire and only sketchy and unverified information 
remained. This left the remediation program at an impasse with 
limited ability to evaluate feasible remedial action and pollution 
reduction options. 
Realizing this information gap problem, the Oak Ridge Operations 
Remote Sensing Program offered assistance in using remotely- 
sensed multispectral and thermal imagery to accurately map the 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B7. Vienna 1996 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.