Full text: XVIIIth Congress (Part B7)

  
When comparing the results of a multitemporal (three 
dates) per field classification based on ERS-1 data with 
the results for JERS-1 data, varying results were obtai- 
ned (cf. table 2). Some crops were classified more 
accurately using JERS-1 data, other crops were classi- 
fied worse in comparison to the use of ERS-1 data. For 
instance, grassland and potatoes were classified most 
accurately using ERS-1 data. On the contrary, sugar 
beet, maize and barley, for instance, were classified 
more accurately using JERS-1 data. The difference in 
overall accuracy between JERS-1 and ERS-1 was only 
minor. Due to the restricted data set the overall accu- 
racies are low in relation to the results with an optimal 
data set (about 80% overall classification accuracy). 
5. FOREST CLASSIFICATION 
5.1 Introduction 
For the classification experiment a selection of species 
from the two forest test sites was made. All species 
and species varieties listed in table 3 occur at least 5 
times, excluding stands with extreme values, i.e. 
stands for which the stand averaged o° deviated from 
the species averaged 0° more then 2 times the stand- 
ard deviation of the stand averaged values. 
Table 3. Selected classes for classification experiment. 
  
‘Dorschkamp” 
'Flevo' 
'Robusta' 
Populus 'Zeeland' 
Populus 'Oxford' 
Acer pseudoplatanus 
Fraxinus excelsior 
Quercus robur 
Pinus sylvestris 
Populus 
Populus 
Populus 
OO o 100100 Nb = 
  
5.2 Classification Method 
To assess classification possibilities, temporal signatu- 
res were visualized to get an impression of class sepa- 
rability. Subsequently, a maximum likelihood classifica- 
tion was made using Bayes criterion. Both approaches 
were applied on the ERS-1 and the JERS-1 data sets 
separately. 
5.3 Classification Results 
The temporal signatures of the selected classes are 
shown in figure 3 for the ERS-1 images. In February all 
poplar classes are clearly differentiated from the other 
tree species. This may be a result of the relatively 
  
  
large trunk size, the relatively high soil moisture con- 
tent at that date and the absence of leaves and under- 
growth. In March the soil is drier and the contrasts are 
lower. In April leaves start to develop and contrasts 
start to change. Especially in May the contrast be- 
tween classes is large and three groups of classes can 
be differentiated. In August the contrasts decrease 
again. It appears to be impossible to properly differen- 
tiate coniferous (Pinus sylvestris) from the deciduous 
species. 
A maximum likelihood classification using four ERS-1 
images resulted into an overall classification accuracy 
of 6596. 
: Sigma 0 (dB) | ———— pop dorschkamp 
| ——Q-—— pop flevo 
— + pop robusta 
——Óo——— pop zeeiand 
| ———— pop oxford 
| ——*—— fraxinus excelsior 
  
|| ——O—— quercus robur 
  
| 
930810 | ——X—— pinus sylvestris 
Acquisition dates | 
930523 
930427 
930216 930323 
Figure 3. Class averaged backscatter as a function of 
time for ERS-1. 
4; 
Sigma 0 (dB) 
——À——- pop dorschkamp 
—{— pop fievo 
"op robusta 
    
  
——o0— — pop zeeland 
De 
"s NORMEN US 
S. 
—— —4—— pop oxford 
  
  
— —t——- Qcer pseudoplatanus 
4 - E c rM Lee fraxinus excelsior 
L10 = E ere Quercus robur 
930212 930328 930512 930807 —— X-— pinus sylvestris 
Acquisition dates 
  
150 
Figure 4. Class averaged backscatter as a function of 
time for JERS-1. 
The temporal signatures for JERS-1 are shown in 
figure 4. Though the wavelength is longer the back- 
scatter level is comparable or even slightly higher. This 
behaviour may be caused by the fact that the longer 
wavelength radiation penetrates deeper into the cano- 
py and is reflected by larger canopy components, i.e. 
by large branches and through the trunk-ground inter- 
action, rather than by leaves and twigs as may be the 
case for the C-band. In the winter observations Popu- 
lus 'Flevo' and Populus 'Dorschkamp' show a relatively 
low backscatter level. These may be caused by the 
low trunk density of these stands and/or the non-verti- 
cal orientation of the trunks. The latter is caused by 
dominant wind and theoretically results in a lower 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B7. Vienna 1996 
| ——— acer pseudoplatanus
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.