ung the 
sland at 
sing the 
)) simu- 
(a) 
        
  
   
     
      
       
  
  
   
    
       
   
      
     
  
  
       
    
         
    
          
        
o LS > y 
; / i i- 
2 2 QV 2 2 
S SAXA 
E // V E > 
E LO ON E E 
= $55 TH ON NN Re 
lc: SE) 70 DN CN Te 
XERXES SANS 
d CS SRE = 7 
SS = m 
8 $533 > 
- y d 
= + á 
hj n (c) 
f 277 7 > 
à IE 48 % 
5 | Ne dg mn i S E i 
pus NS SN 7 X A ANS o A 4 $t 
$ 7 if () a NS NN NN 
3 MN S SN V in t VS SR £ 
ed NN 3 NV I E SS E 
i RR NG TAM 5 © x S S 
$. N ON X N z z m 
© NA SNO - wml s VR. 
WS o S 2% S 2553 SN ZZ RS SON Nm 
      
CAES EN 50K Nez 
"7j, ZS SN nes SS NN 
SIS ANS 
  
   
  
   
CSS SOSA 
      
  
        
Figure 7: polarisation signature (top: co-polarisation and bottom: cross-polarisation) comparison using the 
measured and simulated Mueller matrices for the ocean water in Sydney at P-band: (a) measured, (b) simulated 
and (c) absolute difference. 
Rice, S. O., 1951. Reflection of electromagnetic waves 
from slightly rough surface. In Kline, M., The Theory 
of Electromagnetic Waves. New York: John and Wi- 
ley Inc.. 
Ulaby, F. T., and Elachi C. (editors) 1990. Radar 
Polarimetry for Geoscience Applications. Boston: 
Artech House, Inc.. 
Valenzuela, G. R., 1967. Depolarisation of EM waves 
by slightly rough surfaces. IEEE Trans on Antennas 
and Propagation, AP-15(4), pp. 552-557. 
van de Hulst, H. C., 1957. Light Scattering by Small 
Particles. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.. 
van Zyl, J. J., 1989. Unsupervised classification of 
scattering behaviour using radar polarimetry data. 
IEEE Trans on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 27(1), 
pp. 36-45. 
Zebker, H. A., and van Zyl, J. J., 1991. Imaging radar 
polarimetry: a review. Proceedings of IEEE, 99(11), 
pp. 1583-1605. 
203 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B7. Vienna 1996