ter)
5)-2. Consideration of each district :
Wooden-framed houses of one story existed in great
numbers and in high density in Nagata District.
However, only a few such one-stor ied houses were seen
in Nada District. In Nagata district, wooden-framed
houses were bui | t on narrow sites, and the houses were
crowded on adjacent lots along the network of narrow
streets. These key factors of high density, wooden
frames susceptible to fire, and narrow steets
unsuitable for fire-fighting were causes of the
large-scale urban fire . Concerning the si tuation
of fires extinguished by fire-fighting, fireproof
buildings had to fulfill their roleas firebreaks when
the fire started to spread. In consequence, high
densely crowded houses were at high risk in the event
of a fire or earthquake .
5)-3. Decipherment of the building type :
< Before the earthquake >
There were many open spaces left by the urban planning
of the city government. It would easily have been
possible to predict the destroyed or damaged houses
and the spread of fire from a decipherment of the
building type before the earthquake. |t would have
been guessed that the causes of the spread of fire on
a large scale would be the densely bui | t-up areas, the
network of narrow streets, and the lack of fireproof
structures.
< After the earthquake > (Phtograph 1,2,and 3)
Buildings and houses with high fire resistance were
left intact unless burned-out by fire. Al though these
fireproof bui Idings splendidly fulfilled their roles
in the prevention of the spread of fire, the narrow
Streets turned out to be an obstacle to fire-fighting,
and in addition the high residential density influ-
enced the size of the urban fire disaster.
In thinking about the commercial zoning in both parts
0f No. 2District, the wooden-framed bui Idings will
have to be improved in the renewal planning, in view
of the fact that large numbers of the public were
gathering in these places at any time of day.
3)-4. Analytical dynamics of urban information
(Tables 4,5):
According to information produced by the fire
par tment of Kobe, it was clear that Nagata and Nada
districts had a low level of fire safety.
369
+
Photograph 3. Fireproof Building (Nada District)
Table 3. Decipherment Rate of Building anf House Type
(Nada District)
Building Type | Sample |Decipherment or Not |Rate %
TF 8 4 4 50
Wooden- (2) (6) (25)
Frame
2F~ 15 f 4 73
(11) (4) (73)
~2F 9 7 2 78
Non- (6) (3) (67)
Wooden-
Frame |3F~ 47 41 6 87
(35) (12) (74)
Openspace 7 7 0 100
Area (3) (4) (42)
The points considered were the population density,
the business areas, residential and areas
where fires had previously occurred, according to the
data of1985 (Table 4.)
areas,
When thinking about some data concerning the
characteristic district, for example the ratios of
building type in each district, it was realized that
the amount of open space was low and the number of
wooden-framed houses was high in the No. 2 district
of Nagata and Nada( Table 5.)
In the event of an urban disaster, the lives of
citizens would be dependent upon how much open space
was available.
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B7. Vienna 1996