Full text: XVIIIth Congress (Part B7)

  
  
  
a a 
  
  
0.00 2150 43.00. 64.50 85.00 107.80 120.00 180.80 172.00 193.80 215.00 100 350 B00 S880 1100 13.50 1600 1850 2100 23.50 2600 
Figure 3 2.6m IFOV in infra-red, red and green composite. ~~ Figure 4 Cluster analysis groupings of 
raw data at 2.6m IFOV. 
  
  
  
   
  
    
  
    
225 Ge 
1 B 0.2 IFOV 60% maple 40% beech IM0.6 IFOV 6096 maple 4096 beech | 
200 + E 2.6 IFOV 6096 maple 4096 beech 85.6 IFOV 6096 maple 4096 beech! 
B0.2 IFOV 40% maple 60% beech MO0.6 IFOV 40% maple 60% beech 
175 + 
] N2.6 IFOV 40% maple 60% beech [15.6 IFOV 40% maple 60% beech | 
  
  
150 + 
125 1 
100 + 
mi 
  
  
Infra-red Red Green 
  
  
  
Figure 7 Best Comparative Sample Separation for 60% maple 40% beech 
and 40% maple 60% Beech at IFOV ranging from 0.2m to 5.6m. 
  
  
El 9096 road 109 field IJ 4096 field 3096 rock 2096 soil | | 
i3 5096 field 2096 shrub 2096 rock 8 6096 maple 4096 beech | | 
El 4096 maple 6096 beech E1 8096 redpine 2096 spruce ! 
90% redpine 10% spruce 080% spruce 20% yellow birch 
  
  
  
Infra-red Red 
  
  
  
  
Figure 8 Signature Comparison of all features at 2.6m IFOV. 
64 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B7. Vienna 1996 
  
  
  
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.